首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Mechatronics and Academic Success: Towards Understanding the Impacts of Age, Major, and Technical Experience
【24h】

Mechatronics and Academic Success: Towards Understanding the Impacts of Age, Major, and Technical Experience

机译:机电一体化和学术成功:了解年龄,专业和技术经验的影响

获取原文

摘要

This study built on previous research that found significant differences in the mean level of academic success (i.e., course grades) for students who participated in a mechatronic experience (i.e., integrating mechanical, electronic, and computer systems) vs. those who did not. This paper further examined this variation in course grades by conducting a two-way Analysis of Covariance to understand the impact academic major (i.e., technology major vs. non-technology major) and group assignment (i.e., control vs. treatment) had, while controlling for pre-study covariates of GPA, ACT, age, and technical experience. When adjusting for differences in ACT and GPA scores, we found significant main effects for group assignment (expected), but not for major (unexpected). Furthermore, no interaction effects where found between academic major and group assignment. When analyzing age and previous technical experience level (i.e., mechanical, electrical, and computer systems), we found age to be a significant predictor of course grades, while previous experience (in any area) was not. This would indicate that younger students performed better in the course, while, contrary to education theory, previous technical experience had no impact on course grades. This study used a quasi-experimental, nonequivalent group design with a convenience sample of n = 84 students in a first-year technology course. It looks to expand the empirical foundations supporting the impacts of mechatronic experiences on academic success.
机译:这项研究建立在以前的研究中,参加了参与机电经验的学生(即,集成了机械,电子和计算机系统)与那些没有的学生的学术成功(即课程等级)的平均差异存在显着差异。本文进一步通过对协方差进行双向分析来了解课程等级的这种变化,以了解影响学术专业(即技术主要与非技术主要)和团体分配(即控制与治疗)的影响控制GPA,ACT,年龄和技术经验的研究预科协变量。在调整ACT和GPA分数的差异时,我们发现对组分配(预期)的显着主要影响,但不是主要(意外)。此外,没有在学术专业和团体分配之间发现的互动效应。在分析年龄和以前的技术经验水平(即机械,电气和计算机系统)时,我们发现年龄是课程等级的重要预测因子,而以前的经验(在任何区域)不是。这表明年轻学生在课程中表现更好,而违背教育理论,以前的技术经历对课程成绩没有影响。本研究采用了一种准实验性,非等级的团体设计,在一年的技术课程中具有N = 84名学生的便利样本。它希望扩展支持机电经验对学术成功影响的实证基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号