首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Standardized Tests as a Predictor for Success in Construction Management Technology
【24h】

Standardized Tests as a Predictor for Success in Construction Management Technology

机译:标准化测试作为施工管理技术成功的预测因素

获取原文

摘要

Universities and colleges with Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (STEM) programs use standardized tests of a variety of names to place students into courses. The Assessment and LEarning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS) is an assessment tool created by McGraw-Hill with a mathematics placement module. Similarly, CollegeBoard's Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SAT) and ACT Inc.'s ACT Assessment college entrance exams are used as a basis for admissions into higher education. Since 2012, data has been collected for Engineering and Technology programs to determine if these exams used for admissions and placement actually serve as a predictor for success. This study compares the ALEKS and ACT scores predict success in a comparison to grades achieved in Engineering and Technology classes. Similar studies compared the high school grade point average (GPA) with the ACT as predictors of college success. Other prediction methods are study habits or study types as a predictor for success. Although there are many possible predictors for success, the use of standardized testing is still very popular in higher education. This study seeks to determine if using or the ALEKS or the ACT composite predicts success in engineering and technology fields. More specifically, do standardized math placement tests predict success in future math, physics and engineering based courses? A previous study on learning in the classroom was the basis for this research project. A comparison of success in the course over successive years was performed. Students' success in the classroom was compared to their previous courses and then expanded to include the college entrance exam and math placement exams. This initial research lead to the question examined in the current research, do entrance exams predict success in construction coursework? The study has not found a significant correlation with standardized test scores and success levels in engineering and technology courses. Rather, it has become apparent that success is more likely to breed success. Students who score low on placement tests and then do well in remedial coursework are more likely to find success throughout their college careers. Conversely, students who score well on placement exams and do not perform well in their initial math coursework continue to struggle with grades. Based on this information, increasing entrance exam requirements may not increase retention rates but limit access instead.
机译:大学和学院科学,数学,工程和技术(Stew)计划使用各种名称的标准化测试将学生放入课程。知识空间(Aleks)中的评估和学习是McGraw-Hill与数学放置模块创建的评估工具。同样,电梯的学术态度测试(SAT)和Act Inc.的ACT评估学院入学考试被用作高等教育的入学依据。自2012年以来,已收集数据以用于工程和技术计划,以确定用于招生和放置的这些考试是否实际上是成功的预测因素。本研究比较了Aleks和Act得分预测成功的成功与工程和技术课程所实现的等级相比。与大学成功的预测因素相比,类似的研究比较了高中级数(GPA)。其他预测方法是作为成功的预测器的学习习惯或研究类型。虽然成功有许多可能的预测因子,但在高等教育中使用标准化测试仍然很受欢迎。本研究旨在确定使用或亚历板或ACT综合是否预测工程和技术领域的成功。更具体地说,进行标准化数学放置测试预测未来数学,物理和工程课程的成功吗?以前关于教室的学习研究是该研究项目的基础。在连续年份的课程中取得成功比较。学生在课堂上的成功与以前的课程相比,然后扩展到包括学院入学考试和数学展示考试。这个初步研究导致了当前研究中检查的问题,入学考试预测建筑课程的成功吗?该研究尚未发现与工程和技术课程中的标准化测试分数和成功水平显着相关。相反,它变得显而易见的是成功更有可能滋生成功。在安置测试中得分低的学生,然后在补救课程中做得好,更有可能在整个大学职业中找到成功。相反,在安置考试时得分良好的学生并且在他们的初始数学课程中不再表现良好,并继续与成绩斗争。基于此信息,增加入学考试要求可能不会增加保留率但限制访问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号