首页> 外文会议>World Tribology Congress >A STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF AIRFLOW MITIGATION DEVICES IN HARD DISK DRIVE!
【24h】

A STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF AIRFLOW MITIGATION DEVICES IN HARD DISK DRIVE!

机译:气流缓解装置在硬盘驱动器中的功效研究!

获取原文

摘要

Numerical simulations have revealed several general insights into the flows inside disk drives casings. In close proximity to the actuator arm, especially in the region of the base-plate and suspension, M1 and M2 have the smallest RMS in-plane and out-of-plane velocity fluctuations. M1 and M2 also have the smallest pressure fluctuations in this region while M3 appears to be a bad candidate based on all the RMS data presented. Since pressure-based loading on the actuator accounts for most of the off-track vibrations, both M1 and M2 appear to be suitable candidates for reducing flow induced vibrations. However, we note that velocity fluctuations are also responsible for fluctuation of the forces on the actuator, and their effect may not appear directly in the RMS of the pressure fluctuations, which is a second order statistical moment. Changes in the velocity field near the arm cause changes in circulation around the arm, which is linearly related to the loading on the actuator arm. Taking this into consideration, it appears that M1 is a better candidate than M2 for reducing flow induced vibrations.
机译:数值模拟已经揭示了磁盘驱动器内部流动的一般洞察力。靠近致动器臂,特别是在基板和悬架的区域中,M1和M2具有最小的平面内和面外速度波动。 M1和M2还具有该区域中最小的压力波动,而M3似乎是基于所呈现的所有RMS数据的坏候选者。由于致动器上的基于压力的负载占大多数偏离轨道振动,因此M1和M2都似乎是用于减少流量诱导的振动的合适候选者。然而,我们注意到,速度波动也负责致动器上的力波动,并且它们的效果可能不会直接出现在压力波动的RMS中,这是二阶统计时刻。臂附近的速度场的变化导致臂周围的循环变化,这与致动器臂上的负载线性相关。考虑到这一点,似乎M1是比M2更好的候选,用于减少流量诱导的振动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号