首页> 外文会议>Global Plastics Environmental Conference >AN EXPLORATORY COMPARATIVE STUDY ON ECO-IMPACT OF PAPER AND PLASTIC BAGS(Abstract)
【24h】

AN EXPLORATORY COMPARATIVE STUDY ON ECO-IMPACT OF PAPER AND PLASTIC BAGS(Abstract)

机译:纸张塑料袋生态影响的探索性比较研究(摘要)

获取原文

摘要

Today there are varieties of comments prevail among the consumers who use Plastic & Paper bags for their shopping needs. A few people support Plastic bags with their own justifications and others do for Paper bags. This is a hot topic of today and arguments are going up and down to deduce which one is better in terms of environmental impact, but some people abstain in this issue by having chosen the other track of going with reusable bags. This exploratory study is attempted to infer the environmental concerns made by these bags.The two common grocery bags of today - Paper & Plastic bags are compared in this study. Two imperative measures - total amount of energy used by a bag to get it manufactured and the amount of pollutants a bag produces - are chosen as data for Life Cycle Inventory (LCI). To arrive at a clear state of conclusion with respect to environmental impact made by these two bags, life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) study was accomplished. Evolvement of LCA study from the data available on this context is the crux of this study. The Eco-indicator 99, damage oriented method for LCIA in SEVIAPRO 7.1 tool is used to assess the environmental impact made by these two grocery bags. The Single score values calculated by the Eco-indicator 99 is considered as a directive to compare the environmental impact made by these and a detailed explanation of interpretation of results is also dealt in this paper. As far as the Life cycle energy analysis and amount of pollutants produced from these two bags are concerned, the plastic bag simply out scores the paper bag. The impact assessment results are also in line to support the plastic bags over paper bags. However, this conclusion has been drawn on the basis of the secondary data for LCI and the results provided by the software which also has certain hypotheses and assumptions.
机译:今天,有品种的评论谁用塑料纸袋他们的购物需求的消费者中盛行。一些人支持塑料袋用自己的理由和他人纸袋做。这是今天的一个热门话题和参数上上下下推断哪一个是更好的在环境影响方面,但既然选择了另一条轨道的可重复使用的袋子会有些人在这个问题上投弃权票。这一探索性的研究,试图推断出今天的这些bags.The两种常见的食品袋制成的环境问题 - 纸和塑料袋在这项研究进行了比较。两个势在必行措施 - 用于由袋得到它制造的能量的总量和污染物袋产生的量 - 被选择作为用于生命周期清单(LCI)的数据。在结论相对于这两个袋子做环境影响明显的状态到达,生命周期影响评估(LCIA)研究完成。从这种情况下可用的数据LCA研究的演变是这项研究的关键所在。生态指示灯99,在SEVIAPRO 7.1工具LCIA损害取向方法用于评估由这两个杂货袋制成对环境的影响。通过生态指标99计算的单节得分值被认为是一个指令来比较这些和结果解释的详细解释也处理本文所做的环境影响。至于这两个袋产生的污染物的生命周期能量分析和量而言,塑料袋简单地出分数纸袋。影响评估的结果也符合支持塑料袋套在纸袋。然而,这一结论已经绘就通过也有一定的假设和假设该软件提供了LCI辅助数据和结果的基础上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号