首页> 外文会议>IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference >A learned comparative expression measure for Affymetrix genechip DNA microarrays
【24h】

A learned comparative expression measure for Affymetrix genechip DNA microarrays

机译:Affymetrix GeneChip DNA微阵列学习的比较表达措施

获取原文

摘要

Perhaps the most common question that a microarray study can ask is, "Between two given biological conditions, which genes exhibit changed expression levels?" Existing methods for answering this question either generate a comparative measure based upon a static model, or take an indirect approach, first estimating absolute expression levels and then comparing the estimated levels to one another. We present a method for detecting changes in gene expression between two samples based on data from Affymetrix GeneChips. Using a library of over 200,000 known cases of differential expression, we create a learned comparative expression measure (LCEM) based on classification of probe-level data patterns as changed or unchanged. LCEM uses perfect match probe data only; mismatch probe values did not prove to be useful in this context. LCEM is particularly powerful in the case of small microarry studies, in which a regression-based method such as RMA cannot generalize, and in detecting small expression changes. At the levels of selectivity that are typical in microarray analysis, the LCEM shows a lower false discovery rate than either MAS5 or RMA trained from a single chip. When many chips are available to RMA, LCEM performs better on two out of the three data sets, and nearly as well on the third. Performance of the MAS5 log ratio statistic was notably bad on all datasets.
机译:也许微阵列研究可以问的最常见问题是“在两个给定的生物条件之间,基因表现出改变的表达水平?”现有方法回答这个问题或者产生基于静态模型的比较测量,或采取间接方法中,首先估计绝对表达水平,然后比较所估计的水平到彼此。我们介绍了一种基于来自Affymetrix Genechips的数据来检测两个样品之间基因表达的变化的方法。使用超过20万人的差异表达情况的库,我们基于探针级数据模式的分类来创建学习的比较表达措施(LCEM),改变或不变。 LCEM仅使用完美的匹配探针数据;在这种情况下,不匹配探针值并未证明是有用的。在小型微型研究的情况下,LCEM尤其强大,其中基于回归的方法,例如RMA不能概括,并且在检测到小表达变化时。在微阵列分析中典型的选择性水平,LCEM显示比从单个芯片训练的MAS5或RMA较低的错误发现率。当RMA可用许多芯片时,LCEM在三个数据集中的两个中执行更好,并且在第三个数据集中几乎也在更好。 MAS5日志比率统计的性能在所有数据集上都非常糟糕。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号