【24h】

ECOTOXICOLOGICAL HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF SOLID-PHASE SAMPLES

机译:生态毒理学危害固相样品的评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The legislative control and prediction of hazardous effects in soils and sediments are mainly based on chemical data on the level of selected hazardous key pollutants. This approach has some limitations: inability to account for the bioavailability of the contaminants and foresee the interactive effects of pollutants in complex matrixes. Also there is always the risk of poor selection of the contaminants to be measured. However, additional biological end ecological tests enable to compose a more objective picture of the environmental hazard. Due to the complexity of ecosystems and multifunctional character of toxicity per se which can be chemical, species- and end-point dependent variable, the assessment of polluted wastewaters and soils is recommended to be performed by using several organisms of different trophic levels. However, the selection of a suitable test battery is not a trivial task. With the appearance of new generation of biotesting means, so-called microbiotests, the biological approach to assessing environmental pollution could become a powerful counterpart to the chemical one. Currently ecotoxicological testing (fish, daphnia and algal tests) is introduced in the EC legislation only for the analysis of new chemicals (EC Directive 67/548, 7th amendment 92/32).
机译:土壤和沉积物中危险作用的立法控制和预测主要是基于关于所选危险关键污染物水平的化学数据。这种方法具有一些局限性:无法考虑污染物的生物利用度,并预见到复杂基质中污染物的交互式效果。此外,仍有较差的污染物选择的风险。然而,额外的生物结束生态测试能够构成环境危害的更客观的图像。由于生态系统的复杂性和毒性的多功能特征,可以是化学,物种和终点依赖变量,建议通过使用不同营养水平的几种生物进行污染废水和土壤的评估。但是,选择合适的测试电池不是琐碎的任务。随着新一代生物活性手段的外观,所谓的微生物,评估环境污染的生物学方法可能成为化学物质的强大对应。目前,EC毒理学检测(鱼类,Daphnia和藻类测试)仅供EC立法介绍了新化学品的分析(EC指令67/548,第7修正案92/32)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号