首页> 外文会议>NATO Advanced Research Workshop on the Utilization of Bioremediation to Reduce Soil Contamination: Problems and Solutions >FROM LABORATORY TO INDUSTRIAL SCALE: COMPOSTING OF POLLUTED SOILS FROM FORMER COAL INDUSTRY AND GAS PLANTS: FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS
【24h】

FROM LABORATORY TO INDUSTRIAL SCALE: COMPOSTING OF POLLUTED SOILS FROM FORMER COAL INDUSTRY AND GAS PLANTS: FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS

机译:从实验室到工业规模:堆积前煤炭工业和天然气植物的污染土壤:未来的研究需求

获取原文

摘要

Activities related to coking and, more generally, to transformation of coal, have been quite varied and underwent an intense evolution from the 18th to the 20th century. The pollutants which are likely to be present in the soils at these sites depend on the type of products being made at the site, the technical knowledge at the time of production, and the environmental policy of the company. More than thirty techniques of treatment of polluted soil from similar sites have been described and summarized in reviews published on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The various treatment techniques can be classified into three main categories according to their action on the pollutants: 1. chemical or physical immobilization 2. extraction from the soil matrix 3. destruction Some of these techniques can be applied in situ or after excavation (ex situ). After excavation, the polluted material can be treated on site in a confined area, or be transported off site to a center specialized in the selected technique. The environmental risk and the financial cost inherent in transport made in situ and on-site treatments often advantageous. However, the application of this type of treatment is often severely limited, in particular by the nature of the soil matrix and of the contaminants. Destructive techniques consist mainly of various thermal treatments and biore-mediation. Biological techniques are generally less expensive than the thermal treatments and have the further advantage of a positive "green image" for the general public. Bioremediation techniques do not modify the intrinsic nature of the soil, and thus revegetation can be considered after treatment. It is thus not surprising that these techniques are receiving much attention.
机译:与焦化有关的活动,更普遍地转变煤炭,在第18世纪至20世纪的剧烈演变方面已经变得完全不同。这些网站上的土壤中可能存在的污染物取决于现场制造的产品类型,生产时的技术知识以及公司的环境政策。治疗从类似的网站污染土壤的三十多名技术已经被描述和总结在代表环境保护局(EPA)的各种处理技术可以根据自己对污染物的行动可分为三大类发表评论:1 。化学或物理固定化2.从土壤基质中提取3.破坏这些技术可以原位应用或在挖掘后(EXITU)。在挖掘后,污染的材料可以在限制区域的现场进行处理,或被从现场运送到专门从事所选技术的中心。环境风险和现场运输中固有的财务成本通常是有利的。然而,这种类型的治疗的应用通常严重限制,特别是通过土壤基质和污染物的性质。破坏性技术主要包括各种热处理和生物调解。生物技术通常不如热处理昂贵,并且具有普通公众的正“绿色图像”的进一步优势。生物修复技术不会改变土壤的内在性质,因此在治疗后可以考虑再培养。因此,这些技术是受到大量关注的不足之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号