首页> 外文会议>ASCE civil engineering conference and exposition >Revisiting Rivers of History: Another Look at Life on the Coosa, Tallapoosa, Cahaba, and Alabama Rivers
【24h】

Revisiting Rivers of History: Another Look at Life on the Coosa, Tallapoosa, Cahaba, and Alabama Rivers

机译:重新探查历史河流:另一位看着Coosa,塔帕卢萨,卡巴和阿拉巴马河的生活

获取原文

摘要

It was a coincidence. I had just received the invitation to submit this article to the EWRI Proceedings when the "Coosa-Alabama River Improvement Association Newsletter" arrived to announce that once again President Bush's budget did not include funding to maintain and operate a navigation channel on the Alabama River. Why? Because by federal criteria used to assess navigation projects this stream, which was once crowded with all sorts of watercraft, is now an "unproductive" river. That got me thinking -- thinking about what I had written back in the early 1990s when I was pulling together the loose ends that, when tied up, would be Rivers of History: Life on the Coosa, Tallapoosa, Cahaba, and Alabama. And thinking about what I would say now, to explain why this once important river system, today, isn't. To do this, to make sense of the rise and decline of this remarkable waterway, I need to go back, back to where I began the book, back to the rivers before man came to change them, back to when they still ran wild and free.
机译:这是一个巧合。当“Coosa-Alabama河流改善协会通讯”宣布宣布宣布丛林总统的预算后,我刚收到了向EWRI诉讼提交的邀请,并不包括在阿拉巴马河上维持和经营导航渠道的资金。为什么?因为通过用于评估导航项目的联邦标准,这一流曾经拥挤着各种船只,现在是一个“非生产性”河流。这让我思考 - 思考我在20世纪90年代初写的东西,当我拉着松散的目的时,当被捆绑时,将成为历史的河流:乔科,塔帕卢萨,卡巴和阿拉巴马州的生活。并思考我现在所说的话,解释为什么这一旦这是一个重要的河流系统,不是。要做到这一点,要理解这个非凡的水道的上升和衰退,我需要回去,回到我开始书的地方,回到河边男人来改变他们之前,回到他们仍然疯狂的时候自由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号