首页> 外文会议>ASSE's Professional Development Conference >Integrated Hazards Analysis: Using the Strengths of Multiple Methods to Maximize Effectiveness
【24h】

Integrated Hazards Analysis: Using the Strengths of Multiple Methods to Maximize Effectiveness

机译:综合危害分析:利用多种方法的优点来最大限度地提高有效性

获取原文

摘要

Hazard analysis techniques take on many forms, with some being uniquely developed to assess specific systems, processes, or scenarios. There are also a number of well-known methods that are used on a wide variety of systems, such as What-if/Checklist Analysis, Hazard and Operability Analysis (HazOp), and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Unfortunately, these generalized methods tend to work well on only a part of the risk assessment spectrum, such as failure mode identification, causal factor determination, or risk prioritization, with few of them effectively addressing all aspects of risk evaluation. In this paper, we discuss a hybrid methodology that utilizes the strengths of HazOp and FMEA for failure mode identification and risk prioritization, and Layers of Protection Analysis for evaluation and application of effective controls. As part of the hybridized methodology development, a completely new risk prioritization chart was prepared that allows consideration of risks to the environment, people and business, from both engineered processes and personnel operations.
机译:危险分析技术采取许多形式,有些是唯一开发的,以评估特定的系统,流程或场景。还有许多在各种系统上使用的众所周知的方法,例如 - 如果/清单分析,危险和可操作性分析(HAZOP)以及失效模式和效果分析(FMEA)。不幸的是,这些广义的方法往往良好地在风险评估谱的一部分上工作,例如失败模式识别,因果因子确定或风险优先级,其中很少有效地解决风险评估的所有方面。在本文中,我们讨论了一种混合方法,其利用Hazop和FMEA的强度进行破坏模式识别和风险优先级,以及用于评估和应用有效控制的保护分析。作为杂交方法发展的一部分,准备了一个完全新的风险优先级图,允许从工程流程和人员运营中审议环境,人员和业务的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号