首页> 外文会议>Conference on 42 Volt Automotive Systems >In search of a battery to power the 42V automotive system
【24h】

In search of a battery to power the 42V automotive system

机译:寻找电池供电42V汽车系统

获取原文

摘要

Europe: · Attempts to commercialize 42V in 2003/4 have been delayed -Not enough value, too much technical risk. · If fuel efficiency is the main driver, Diesel is a better solution for Europe. U.S.: No clear market driver but Diesel is unlikely to be accepted in the U.S. (California) Japan: The market driver is fuel efficiency-Higher voltage makes more sense! The proliferation of 42V Vehicles is 5 to 8 years away and will depend upon: · Governments' determination to address global environmental issues and express the level of their commitment via mandates, incentives, and taxation. · Consumer demand for advanced features, which will add further pressure to the need for a significant upgrade of the vehicles' electrical systems. · Improvement of system reliability and reduction of system cost. Battery Technology and Lead Acid: · The battery is becoming a more critical component of vehicle functionality; · The basic 42V vehicle could only afford lead-acid chemistry; · VRLA, if proven reliable, will start to take market share in both advanced 12V and 36/42V applications; · Energy and power management will become common; · Improvement in VRLA life and reliability is a tie breaker for the commercial viability of 42V ISS and for 42V Launch Assist applications (current life is about 1 year); · R&D investment in advanced VRLA is largest in Japan; · Unless a breakthrough in lead acid performance occurs, mild and power assist hybrid vehicles will require a more expensive power source. The candidate power sources for hybrid vehicles by order of maturity, but not necessarily long-term potential, are: · NiMH: → Pros: Long and proven life; → Cons: Cost, low temperature power, and charge efficiency; → Two big names (Panasonic and Sanyo) with several secondary contenders. · Li Ion: → Pros: Power; → Cons: Cost, abuse tolerance, life unproven; → The leaders are major Japanese producers and Saft. · VRLA & Ultracapacitor hybrid: → Pros: Operating temperature range, power, raw materials; → Cons: Current cost, power management, early development stage; → Interest in UltraCap is growing steadily and there are new players If hybridization is the main driver, Higher voltage than 42 is probably. If hybridization is the main driver, Higher voltage than 42 is probably preferred.
机译:欧洲:·在2003/4中尝试将42V商业化42V已延迟 - 不足,衡量太大的技术风险。 ·如果燃油效率是主要的驱动因子,柴油是欧洲的更好解决方案。 U.S .:没有明确的市场司机,但在美国(加利福尼亚州)日本不太可能被接受柴油:市场司机是燃料效率 - 更高的电压更有意义! 42V车辆的扩散距离5至8年,依靠:·政府的决心解决全球环境问题,并通过任务,激励和税收来表达其承诺的水平。 ·消费者对先进特征的需求,这将为车辆电气系统的大量升级增加进一步的压力。 ·提高系统可靠性和系统成本降低。电池技术和铅酸:·电池成为车辆功能的更关键的组成部分; ·基本42V车辆只能提供铅酸化学; ·VRLA,如果证明可靠,将开始在高级12V​​和36/42V应用中取得市场份额; ·能源和电力管理将变得普遍; ·VRLA寿命和可靠性的提高是42V ISS的商业可行性的绑架破坏者,并且对于42V发射辅助应用(当前寿命约为1年); ·研发投资高级VRLA是日本最大的; ·除非发生铅酸性能的突破,否则温和和动力辅助混合动力车辆需要更昂贵的电源。候选电力源为混合动力车辆按成熟度顺序,但不一定是长期潜力,是:·Nimh:→优点:长期且又一次的生活; →缺点:成本,低温功率和充电效率; →两个大名字(Panasonic和Sanyo)与几个二级竞争者。 ·李离子:→优点:力量; →缺点:成本,滥用耐受性,生活未经证实; →领导者是主要的日本生产商和SAFT。 ·VRLA和UltraCapacitor Hybrid:→优点:工作温度范围,电源,原料; →缺点:当前成本,电源管理,早期发展阶段; →Ultracap的兴趣正在稳步增长,如果杂交是主驱动器,则有新的玩家可能,可能更高的电压可能。如果杂交是主驱动器,则可能优选高于42的电压。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号