首页> 外文会议>International Offshore and polar engineering conference >Considerations for Judging the Suitability of Substitute Filling Materials for Compaction Pile Methods
【24h】

Considerations for Judging the Suitability of Substitute Filling Materials for Compaction Pile Methods

机译:用于判断替代填充材料的适用性进行压实桩方法的考虑因素

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To implement the sand compaction pile (SCP) method for soft ground improvement, so as to effectively use construction surplus soils and other recycled materials such as slag and coal ash, the authors have examined the suitability of such filling materials. Due to their high fines content, these materials are not easy to handle, and this may significantly affect their smooth implementation, or sometimes implementation impossible in the worst case. Thus, for the implementation of substitute filling materials to compaction pile, their evaluation needs to be made in advance by means of simple soil tests. Field site tests using such materials have been conducted so far by examining their suitability for easiness of implementation and improvement effect. These procedures, however, were time and cost consuming. This paper proposes a design flow to assess the applicability of filling materials for compaction pile methods, based on the findings from available laboratory and field site tests data. Furthermore, the suitability of the proposed design flow is confirmed from the results gained by applying it to test and actual implementations.
机译:为了实现砂压力桩(SCP)方法进行软接地改进,以便有效地使用施工剩余土壤和其他再生材料,如炉渣和煤灰等再循环材料,作者已经检查了这种填充材料的适用性。由于其高罚款含量,这些材料不易处理,这可能会显着影响其顺利实现,或者有时在最坏情况下实施不可能实现。因此,为了实现替代填充材料来压实桩,需要通过简单的土壤测试提前提前进行它们的评估。到目前为止,通过检查它们的适应性和改善效果的适用性来进行使用这种材料的现场测试。然而,这些程序是时间和成本消耗。本文提出了一种设计流程,以评估填充材料的适用性基于可用实验室和现场现场测试数据的研究结果。此外,通过将其应用于测试和实际实现来确认所提出的设计流程的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号