首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Polymers >A Comparative Study on Suitability of Model-Free and Model-Fitting Kinetic Methods to Non-Isothermal Degradation of Lignocellulosic Materials
【2h】

A Comparative Study on Suitability of Model-Free and Model-Fitting Kinetic Methods to Non-Isothermal Degradation of Lignocellulosic Materials

机译:无型和模型配合动力学方法对木质纤维素材料非等温降解的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The thermal kinetic modeling is crucial for development of sustainable processes where lignocellulosic fuels are a part of chemical system and their thermal degradation eventuates. In this paper, thermal decomposition of three lignocellulosic materials (bagasse, rice husk, and wheat straw) was obtained by the thermogravimetric (TG) technique and kinetics was analyzed by both model-fitting and isoconversional (model-free) methods to compare their effectiveness. Two models selected from each class include Arrhenius and Coats–Redfern (model-fitting), and Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS) and Flynn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO) (model-free). The formal model-fitting approach simulating the thermal decomposition of solids by assuming a fixed mechanism was found to be unduly facile. However, activation energy (E) values calculated from two model-fitting techniques were considerably different from each other with a percentage difference in the range of 1.36% to 7.65%. Particularly, both model-fitting methods predicted different reaction mechanism for thermal disintegration of lignocellulosic materials (two-dimensional diffusion (D2) by Arrhenius and one-dimensional diffusion (D1) by Coat–Redfern method). Conversely, the model-free routine offers a transformation of mechanism and activation energy values throughout reaction and is, therefore, more authentic to illustrate the complexity of thermal disintegration of lignocellulosic particles. Based on the model-free kinetic analysis, the lignocellulosic materials may be devised in following order of activation energy: rice husk > bagasse > wheat straw, by both KAS and FWO methods with a percentage difference no more than 0.84% for fractional conversion up to 0.7. Isoconversional approach could be recommended as more realistic and precise for modeling non-isothermal kinetics of lignocellulosic residues compared to model-fitting approach.
机译:热动力学建模对于开发可持续过程至关重要,其中木质纤维素燃料是化学系统的一部分及其热降解事件。在本文中,通过热量标量(TG)技术获得了三种木质纤维素材料(甘蔗纤维纤维素材料(Bagasse,稻壳和小麦秸秆)的热分解,通过模型拟合和异组(无模型)方法分析了动力学来比较它们的有效性。从每个班级中选择的两种型号包括Arrhenius和Coats-Redifern(型号),以及Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose(KAS)和Flynn-Wall-Ozawa(FWO)(无模型)。通过假设固定机构,模拟固体的热分解的正式模型配合方法是过度的。然而,从两个模型拟合技术计算的激活能量(E)值彼此相比不同,百分比差为1.36%至7.65%。特别地,模型配合方法都预测了木质纤维素材料的热崩解的不同反应机制(通过CAT-REDFERN方法通过ARRHenius和一维扩散(D1)的热崩解的不同反应机制。相反,无模型常规在整个反应中提供机构和激活能量值的转化,因此更加真实,以说明木质纤维素颗粒的热解体的复杂性。基于无模型动力学分析,木质纤维素材料可以以以下激活能量顺序设计:稻壳>甘蔗渣>小麦秸秆,通过KAS和FWO方法,百分比差异不超过0.84%,用于分数转换0.7。与模型配件方法相比,可以推荐对木质纤维素残留物的非等温动力学来建立更加逼真和精确的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号