首页> 外文会议>SAE World Congress >The analysis and comparison of cup-holder and ashtray designs using the principle of axiomatic design
【24h】

The analysis and comparison of cup-holder and ashtray designs using the principle of axiomatic design

机译:使用公理设计原理的杯架和烟灰缸设计的分析与比较

获取原文

摘要

The location of cup-holders and ashtray on vehicle instrument panel can affect instrument panel appearance as well as cup-holder and ashtray functionality. Axiomatic Design was used to analyze and compare the designs of cup-holders and ashtray for three 1999 model-year full-size pickup trucks. The customer domain was mapped into the functional domain by specifying customer needs in terms of functional requirements (FRs) and constraints (Cs). Design parameters (DP) were identified in the physical domain for each functional requirement. Design matrices were then defined to characterize the product design. The ashtray and cup-holders are treated as one subsystem of the instrument panel. There are two functional requirements in this sub-system at the highest level: storing ash/garbage and holding cups. The corresponding DPs are: ashtray assembly and cup-holder assembly. Through zigzagging to decompose to the next level, one of the designs was found to be coupled. At this level, the free space required for holding cups was found to affect the opening of the ashtray. When the cup-holders are holding cups, the ashtray can not be opened. This coupled design is obviously a bad design because the functions of cup-holders and ashtray can not be achieved at the same time but customers sometimes do need to use both functions at the same time. Other designs are not coupled and therefore are better designs. It is obvious the designers for this coupled design have not applied Axiomatic Design principles. Therefore, the design is a bad design and it lowers the customer satisfaction. The analysis and comparison were based on only two basic main functions of the ashtray and cup-holder subsystem: storing ash/garbage and holding cups. In fact, there are many more functional requirements for this subsystem: providing flexibility to different cup sizes, providing stability for cups, providing the stability for the whole cup-holder assembly and ashtray assembly, and providing ease of access to driver and passenger and so on. We are not discussing those details in this paper.
机译:车辆仪表板上的杯架和烟灰缸的位置可以影响仪器面板外观以及杯架和烟灰缸功能。公理设计用于分析和比较1999年型号全尺寸皮卡架的杯架和烟灰缸的设计。通过在功能要求(FRS)和约束(CS)方面指定客户需求,将客户域映射到功能域。设计参数(DP)在物理域中识别出每个功能要求。然后定义设计矩阵以表征产品设计。烟灰缸和杯架被视为仪表板的一个子系统。在最高级别的该子系统中有两个功能要求:储存灰/垃圾和持有杯子。相应的DP是:烟灰缸组件和杯架组件。通过Zigzagging来分解为下一个级别,发现其中一个设计被耦合。在此级别,发现持有杯子所需的自由空间会影响烟灰缸的开口。当杯架拿着杯子时,烟灰缸不能打开。这种耦合设计显然是一种糟糕的设计,因为杯架和烟灰缸的功能不能同时实现,但客户有时需要同时使用这两种功能。其他设计不耦合,因此设计更好。显而易见的是,该耦合设计的设计者没有应用公理设计原则。因此,设计是一个糟糕的设计,它降低了客户满意度。分析和比较仅基于烟灰缸和杯架子系统的两个基本主要功能:储存灰/垃圾和持有杯子。事实上,该子系统有许多功能要求:为不同的杯子尺寸提供灵活性,为杯子提供稳定性,为整个杯架组件和烟灰缸组装提供稳定性,并易于访问驾驶员和乘客等在。我们没有在本文中讨论这些细节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号