首页> 外文会议>NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Source Control Measures for Stormwater Runoff >REVIEW OF STORMWATER SOURCE CONTROLS IN AGRICULTURAL CATCHMENTS
【24h】

REVIEW OF STORMWATER SOURCE CONTROLS IN AGRICULTURAL CATCHMENTS

机译:农业集水区雨水源控制综述

获取原文

摘要

(a) Urbanisation and intensive agricultural operations are similar in many ways and different in others in terms of both impact on aquatic ecosystems and practices (both structural and non-structural) to mitigate these impacts. Source controls are one such practice; they take different forms at the farmstead and field levels. (b) In this paper, source controls are classified as those primarily directed at controlling runoff quantity (which also mitigate water quality impacts) and those concerned with runoff quality. As is the case in urban areas, the former generally have a longer history than the latter. This classification s somewhat artificial. For example, early practices for reducing runoff also reduced erosion and sediment in receiving waters. However, the focus on erosion was soil loss rather than quality of the receiving waters or ecosystem degradation so that the classification still applies. (c) Measures for reducing runoff and erosion, which are applied at the field level, include conservation tillage, cover cropping, and maintaining/restoring wetlands. Measures for enhancing water quality, which are applied both at the farmstead and field levels, include education, awareness and participation, process control, input and waste management, and buffer zones and shelter belts. (d) For each of the above measures, there are both general and specific guidelines, and demonstrated performance through research and demonstration projects. However, at the field level in particular, there is far more variation in acceptable measures than in the urban case. This is due primarily to the wider variation in the natural environment than in the built environment, but also to the wider variation in economic incentives/disincentives. (e) Another difference between the urban and agricultural cases, in some instances, is the proximity of the source to the upper ends of the impact 3d aquatic ecosystems and the general affinity that fanners have to the land. As a result, one might expect more receptive audience for education, awareness and participation measures.
机译:(a)城市化和密集的农业运营在许多方面和其他人的不同方面与水生生态系统和实践(结构和非结构性)的影响相似,以减轻这些影响。源控制是一种这样的练习;他们在农场和场地上采取不同的形式。 (b)在本文中,源对照被归类为主要针对控制径流量(也减轻水质影响)和关注径流质量的人。与城市地区一样,前者通常具有比后者更长的历史。这个分类是有点人为的。例如,减少径流的早期实践也降低了接收水域的侵蚀和沉积物。然而,对侵蚀的关注是土壤损失而不是接收水域或生态系统退化的质量,因此分类仍然适用。 (c)减少径流和侵蚀的措施,包括在现场水平,包括保护耕作,覆盖种植和维持/恢复湿地。加强水质的措施,这些措施适用于农田和现场水平,包括教育,意识和参与,过程控制,投入和废物管理,以及缓冲区和庇护带。 (d)对于上述每个措施,通过研究和示范项目兼出一般和具体的指导方针,并表现出绩效。然而,特别是在现场水平上,可接受措施的变化远远多于城市案例。这主要是由于自然环境中更广泛的变化而不是建造环境,而且还涉及经济激励措施/抑制措施的更广泛的变化。 (e)在某些情况下,城市和农业案件之间的另一个差异是源头到施力3D水生生态系统的上端的源泉和扇形对土地的一般亲和力。因此,人们可能会期待教育,意识和参与措施更有接受的观众。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号