首页> 外文会议>Ground Water Protection Council annual forum >Tides of Federalism — The Potential Implications of Bragg v. West Virginia Coal Association for the Balance between the Federal Government and the States under Selected Regulatory Environmental Laws
【24h】

Tides of Federalism — The Potential Implications of Bragg v. West Virginia Coal Association for the Balance between the Federal Government and the States under Selected Regulatory Environmental Laws

机译:联邦制的潮汐 - 布拉格诉武器队的潜在影响。西弗吉尼亚州煤炭协会在联邦政府与各国根据选定的监管环境法

获取原文

摘要

This paper discusses a recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Bragg v. Robertson) that raises potential implications for the balance between the federal government and the states under environmental laws. Although the case involves the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act it can also affect other laws, especially the Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act. The paper summarizes the decision in plain language. It further discusses important questions raised by the decision, including the following. What is the precedential value of the judgment? Does the decision reflect a general trend in the courts? What are the implications for other federally approved state environmental programs? Does the ruling bolster the authority of the states to make environmental decisions?
机译:本文讨论了美国上诉的最新决定,对第四巡回赛(Bragg v.Robertson)提出了对联邦政府与环境法下的股权之间的潜在影响。虽然案件涉及表面采矿控制和填海行为,但它也会影响其他法律,尤其是安全饮用水法和清洁水法。本文以简单的语言概述了决定。它进一步讨论了决定提出的重要问题,包括以下内容。判断的预先值是什么?该决定是否反映了法院的一般趋势?对其他联邦批准的国家环境计划有什么影响?裁决是否会使各国的权威制定环境决策?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号