首页> 外文OA文献 >Amicus Curiae Brief of the Guarini Center on Environmental, Energy and Land Use Law at New York University School of Law in Support of Petitioners (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association, Supreme Court of the United States)
【2h】

Amicus Curiae Brief of the Guarini Center on Environmental, Energy and Land Use Law at New York University School of Law in Support of Petitioners (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association, Supreme Court of the United States)

机译:纽约大学法学院瓜里尼环境,能源和土地使用法中心为支持请愿人提供的法庭信息摘要(联邦能源管理委员会诉美国最高法院电力供应协会)

摘要

NYU Law’s Guarini Center submitted this amicus brief to the Supreme Court supporting the US government’s position in the case Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association.The outcome of the case will determine the extent to which the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) can regulate and promote demand response programs in wholesale electricity markets. These programs pay consumers for reducing their electricity consumption when demand is high, such as on hot summer days.The brief argues that the Court should reverse the D.C. Circuit’s holding below, which took a restrictive interpretation of FERC’s jurisdiction, and thereby preserve FERC’s authority over wholesale demand response programs. The brief emphasizes that these programs play a critical role in promoting the performance of the organized wholesale electricity markets that FERC regulates by enabling market operators to meet electricity needs through the lowest cost means available. Wholesale demand response programs benefit consumers by reducing the cost of electricity, and can confer environmental benefits, such as facilitating the incorporation of renewable energy sources in the electricity system.For over fifteen years, FERC has worked step by step to incorporate demand response programs into the wholesale energy markets as the Commission has become increasingly convinced of the benefits such programs provide. The D.C. Circuit decision could undo this long and careful process. The brief accordingly urges the Supreme Court to reverse the Court of Appeals’ jurisdictional decision.The brief was a collaborative effort of the Guarini Center’s Faculty Director Richard B. Stewart, Energy Program Director Katrina M. Wyman, and Executive Director Danielle Spiegel-Feld. Michael Lenoff, a member of the JD class of 2007, provided research assistance.
机译:纽约大学法学院的瓜里尼中心向美国最高法院提交了该法庭之诉摘要,以支持美国政府在联邦能源管理委员会诉电力供应协会一案中的立场,该案的结果将决定联邦能源管理委员会(FERC)的程度可以规范和促进电力批发市场的需求响应计划。这些计划为消费者提供了在需求旺盛时(例如在炎热的夏季)减少用电量的费用。摘要指出,法院应撤销DC巡回法院在以下方面的控股权,这对FERC的管辖权进行了限制性解释,从而保留了FERC的权力。批发需求响应计划。简报强调,这些计划通过促进市场运营商通过可用的最低成本手段来满足电力需求,从而在促进FERC监管的有组织批发电力市场的绩效中发挥关键作用。批发需求响应计划通过降低用电成本使消费者受益,并且可以赋予环境效益,例如促进将可再生能源纳入电力系统。十五年来,FERC一直在逐步将需求响应计划纳入随着欧盟委员会越来越相信这种计划所带来的好处,批发能源市场也越来越受欢迎。直流电巡回决定可能会撤消这一漫长而仔细的过程。因此,该摘要敦促最高法院撤销上诉法院的管辖权裁决。该摘要是瓜里尼中心教务主任理查德·斯图尔特,能源计划主任卡特里娜·M·怀曼和执行董事丹妮尔·斯皮格尔·费尔德的共同努力。 2007年JD类成员Michael Lenoff提供了研究帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号