首页> 外文会议>International Symposium of the British Crop Protection Council >Documentation of pesticide applications in arable farming - a study on German farmers' experiences and approaches
【24h】

Documentation of pesticide applications in arable farming - a study on German farmers' experiences and approaches

机译:耕种农业应用的文献 - 德国农民经验与方法的研究

获取原文

摘要

In Germany, recording of pesticide applications came into farmers' practice following the last official revision of the guidelines for good agricultural practice (GAP). These guidelines demand detailed documentation of pesticide measures taken. The recent plant protection act does not make documentation mandatory, but there is a demand for consideration of GAP. In fact, EU legislations 178/2002, 852/2004 and 183/2005 require documentation of the complete agricultural process chain, including plant protection. Additionally, in many cases, documentation of pesticide use and application data is already required by traders, millers, process labels and contract partners. Thus, farmers are forced in several ways to fulfil proper documentation. Nevertheless, critics of pesticide use argue that such documentation is insufficient and that misuse may still take place. Data are lacking, however, to evaluate the current state of agricultural practice in this area.
机译:在德国,在良好农业实践准则(差距)的最后一次官方修订后,农民应用的录音进入农民的实践。这些指导方针要求采取的农药措施的详细文件。最近的植物保护法没有制定文件强制性,但需要考虑差距。事实上,欧盟立法178/2002,852/2004和183/2005要求文件完整的农业过程链,包括植物保护。此外,在许多情况下,交易商,米勒,流程标签和合同合作伙伴已经要求农药使用和应用数据的文件。因此,农民以几种方式强迫履行适当的文件。然而,农药使用批评者认为这种文件不足,仍可能发生误用。然而,数据缺乏评估该地区的农业实践现状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号