首页> 外文会议>European Corrosion Congress >Compatibility of sealing materials with biodiesel, bioethanolgasoline and biodiesel-heating oil blends
【24h】

Compatibility of sealing materials with biodiesel, bioethanolgasoline and biodiesel-heating oil blends

机译:用生物柴油,生物乙醇糖苷和生物柴油加热油混合物的密封材料的兼容性

获取原文

摘要

Biofuels including ethanol and biodiesel (fatty acid methyl ester) represent an important renewable fuel alternative to petroleum-derived transport fuels. Materials compatibility is a major concern whenever the fuel composition is changed in a fuel system. The aim of this work is to study the interaction between sealing materials such as FKM (fluorocarbon rubber), EPDM (ethylene-propylene-diene rubber), CR (chloroprene rubber), CSM (chlorosulfonated polyethylene), NBR (acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber), IIR (butyl rubber), VMQ (methyl-vinyl-silicone rubber) and FVMQ (methylfluoro- silicone rubber) and biofuels such as biodiesel, E85 (fuel with 85% ethanol) and B10 (heating oil with 10% biodiesel) at 70°C for 84 days. Experiments were conducted with tests specimens of these elastomers to document the changes in the mass and tensile properties of these sealing materials according to ISO 1817. The exposure tests of the elastomers in E85 showed that the weight gain caused by swelling of the test specimens was in the range of 3% to 12%. However, the weight gain of the fluorinated elastomers was at the lower end of this range. Tensile strength and breaking elongation decreased by 22% to 61% or 13% to 77%. The lowest decrease was determined for FKM, VMQ und IIR. These sealing materials were evaluated as resistant to E85 up to a temperature of 70°C. Biodiesel absorbed water more quickly and aged faster than conventional diesel fuel. The weight gain of the elastomers varied between 9% (FKM) and 138% (CR) in biodiesel. FKM was evaluated as resistant with a 16% reduction in tensile strength, a 2% reduction in breaking elongation and low weight loss. NBR, EPDM, CR, IIR, CSM and VMQ were evaluated as not resistant. CR even lost 100% of its original tensile strength and breaking elongation. The highest weight gain as a result of swelling was measured for CR with 240%, IIR with 190%, CSM with 86%, EPDM with 84% and VMQ with 54% in B10, while the fluorine-containing elastomers FKM (1%) and FVMQ (3%) absorbed much less B10 and swelled less. FKM lost 23% in tensile strength and 17% in breaking elongation, and FMVQ lost 29% in tensile strength and 36% in breaking elongation. FMVQ was, therefore, only limited in its resistance to B10. The elastomers NBR, EPDM, CR, CSM, IIR and VMQ were not resistant to B10 at all as the decrease in the tensile properties was significantly over 50%. NBR lost about 93% and CR and CSM about 100% of their breaking elongation. The conclusion of the investigations at 70°C is that FKM is the most resistant sealing material in biodiesel, E85 (fuel with 85% ethanol) and B10 (heating oil with 10% biodiesel).
机译:包括乙醇和生物柴油(脂肪酸甲酯)在内的生物燃料代表了石油衍生的运输燃料的重要可再生燃料替代品。材料兼容性是在燃料系统中改变燃料组合物时的主要问题。本作作品的目的是研究密封材料等FKM(氟碳橡胶),EPDM(乙烯 - 丙烯 - 二烯橡胶),Cr(氯丁烯橡胶),CSM(氯核酸聚乙烯),NBR(丙烯腈 - 丁二烯橡胶)之间的相互作用,IIR(丁基橡胶),VMQ(甲基乙烯基硅橡胶)和FVMQ(methylfluoro-硅橡胶)和生物燃料如生物柴油,E85(燃料用85%乙醇)和B10在70(含10%的生物柴油加热油) °C 84天。用这些弹性体的试验进行实验,以记录根据ISO 1817的这些密封材料的质量和拉伸性能的变化。E85中弹性体的曝光试验表明,由试样肿胀引起的重量增益3%至12%的范围。然而,氟化弹性体的重量增益位于该范围的下端。拉伸强度和断裂伸长率降低22%至61%或13%至77%。为FKM,VMQ und IIR确定最低的减少。将这些密封材料评价为耐E85的耐高温为70℃。生物柴油更快地吸收水,比传统的柴油燃料更快。弹性体的重量增益在生物柴油中变化在9%(FKM)和138%(Cr)之间。评估FKM作为抗拉强度降低的16%,断裂伸长率和低重量损失减少了2%。评估NBR,EPDM,CR,IIR,CSM和VMQ不抗拒。 CR甚至失去了100%的原始拉伸强度和断裂伸长率。作为溶胀的最高重量增益为溶胀,含量为240%,IIR为190%,CSM,86%,EPDM,B10中的84%和VMQ,含氟弹性体FKM(1%)和FVMQ(3%)吸收得多,B10少得多,较少膨胀。 FKM在抗拉强度下损失了23%,突破伸长率为17%,并且FMVQ在拉伸强度下损失了29%,突破伸长率为36%。因此,FMVQ仅限于其对B10的抵抗力。弹性体NBR,EPDM,Cr,CSM,IIR和VMQ根本不抵抗B10,因为拉伸性能的降低显着超过50%。 NBR丢失了大约93%,CR和CSM约100%的突破伸长。在70°C下调查的结论是FKM是生物柴油中最具耐抗性密封材料,E85(带85%乙醇的燃料)和B10(加热油与10%生物柴油)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号