首页> 外文会议>ACEEE study on energy efficiency in buildings >An Examination of the Performance and Acceptance of Compact Fluorescent Bulbs and Fixtures in the Residential Market
【24h】

An Examination of the Performance and Acceptance of Compact Fluorescent Bulbs and Fixtures in the Residential Market

机译:探讨住宅市场紧凑型荧光灯泡和夹具的性能和接受

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper analyzes sales and returns data from a number of efficient lighting programs Energy Federation, Inc. (EFI) implemented with utility clients and state public benefits charges administrators from 1994 through 2001. These programs promoted sales of compact fluorescent lights (CFLs), hardwire and plug-in compact fluorescent fixtures, to residential customers. The analysis of over 2,100,000 product sales, and 47,000 product returns, suggests that consumers buying CFLs are satisfied with the products, and experience relatively few problems with them. There are statistically significant variances in return rates between different styles of CFLs. The most popular CFLs, 'bare glass' bulbs such as spirals, triples, and quads, have the lowest ratio of returns to sales. CFLs that either trap heat, such as capsules, or are placed in applications where ambient temperatures are likely to be high, such as reflectors, and products that are dimmable or have multiple light levels, have a much higher ratio of returns to sales. Compact fluorescent fixtures do not perform as reliably as CFLs - at least at this point in time. Hardwire fixtures appear to present some difficult design challenges which the fixture manufacturing industry has yet to address successfully. As with CFLs, problems are manifested similarly among name brand and more obscure manufacturers. As with CFLs, some types of fixtures are more prone to fail, or to be rejected by customers for some perceived shortcoming, than other types of fixtures. Plug-in compact fluorescent fixtures have higher return rates than CFLs, but appreciably lower return rates than hardwire compact fluorescent fixtures. The return rates of plug-in fixtures would be much lower if the category of torchieres were excluded. The torchieres return rates are comparatively high principally because of problems unrelated to ballast or lamp performance or reliability ― such as difficulties customers encounter assembling the products, and switch failures. For plug-in fixtures, there do appear to be significant differences in product quality among manufacturers.
机译:本文分析了许多有效的照明课程的销售和返回数据,其中一些有效的照明课程,Inc.(EFI)与公用事业客户和国家公共利益收取1994年至2001年的管理员。这些方案促进了销售紧凑型荧光灯(CFL),硬连线销售和插入式紧凑型荧光灯固定装置,到住宅客户。分析超过2,100,000个产品销售和47,000个产品回报,表明购买CFL的消费者对产品感到满意,并且经历对它们的问题相对较少。在不同风格的CFL之间存在统计学上的差异。最受欢迎的CFL,'裸露的玻璃'灯泡,如螺旋,三元组和四边形,具有最低的销售比率比率。捕获热量的CFL,例如胶囊,或者放置在环境温度可能高的应用中,例如反射器和可调光的产品或具有多个光线的产品,具有更高的销量比率。紧凑型荧光夹具不会像CFL一样可靠地执行 - 至少在此时的时间点。 HardWire灯具似乎呈现出一些难以成功地解决的旨在解决的困难设计挑战。与CFL一样,在名牌品牌和更模糊的制造商之间表现出类似的问题。与CFL一样,某些类型的灯具更容易发生,或者被客户拒绝,以便对某些感知的缺点,而不是其他类型的夹具。插入式紧凑型荧光灯件具有比CFL更高的回归率,但明显降低返回率,而不是硬丝紧凑型荧光灯。如果排除了火炬类别,则插入式夹具的回归速率将多得多。由于与镇流器或灯的性能或可靠性无关的问题,火炬回归率相对较高 - 例如遇到产品的困难客户,以及切换故障。对于插入式夹具,厂家之间的产品质量似乎似乎存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号