首页> 外文会议>Workshop on industrial and environmental applications of direct and large-eddy simulation >LES of turbulence and turbulent combustion: advances and theoretical limitations
【24h】

LES of turbulence and turbulent combustion: advances and theoretical limitations

机译:湍流和湍流燃烧:进步和理论局限

获取原文

摘要

Large Eddy Simulations account for the subgrid velocity fluctuations ina model (analytic) way. It is argued that due to small-scale intermittency, the LES models based on the Kolmogorov-Smagorinki phenomenology must fail for any mesh size #DELTA# when the Reynolds number is large enough and #DELTA# corresponds to the scales in the inertial range. Physically, the existing phenomenology treats very strong and weak fluctuations on the equal footing as governed by the single parameter (mean dissipation rate). This leads to unreasonably large overproduction of kinetic energy and, as a consequence, poor predictions. Intermittency disappears at the large scales and that is why the time-dependent VLES schemes are much more successfull in descibing hi Reynolds number flows. Various examples, presented in the paper support this point of view.
机译:大型涡流模拟算法划分速度波动INA模型(分析)方式。有人认为,由于小规模间歇性,基于Kolmogorov-Smagorinki现象学的LES模型必须在雷诺数足够大并且#delta#对应于惯性范围内的尺度时,任何网格尺寸#delta#都必须失败。身体上,现有的现象学对单个参数(平均耗散率)治理的平等基础上的非常强大和弱波动。这导致动能的不合理大量生产力,因此预测差。间歇性在大尺度上消失,这就是为什么时间依赖的VLES方案在解除reynolds数字流程中更加成功。本文提出的各种示例支持此观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号