【24h】

Thinking in electronic terms

机译:以电子术语思考

获取原文

摘要

What will emerge as the dominant design(s) of the "information package" of the future? How do we resolve major obstacles to the creation and utilization of electronic documents? What concepts, terms, and design principles need to be defined to discuss these questions meaningfully and to start answering them? What do these new concepts, terms and design principles mean in editorial and publishing practice? Drawing on the experience of developing: Living Reviews in Relativity, an innovative online journal for physics, the paper discusses these latter questions. The paper highlights some of the information needs which Living Reviews fills and explains how the principles guiding its design attempt to meet those needs. These design principles are "synergy", "adaptability", and "utilizability" of information. In addition, the paper discusses a basic assumption that, rather than having readers, Living Reviews has users for whom we are providing a research tool. Combining that perspective with the fact that we are offering (literature/research) review articles, and with the fact that we are working in an electronic environment which allows multiple forms of indexing and presentation, we have decided to treat our reference information as highly significant. The paper discusses how we treat this information as significant, and the impact we expect this treatment to have.
机译:什么会成为未来“信息包”的主导设计?我们如何解决电子文件创建和利用的主要障碍?需要定义哪些概念,术语和设计原则以略微讨论这些问题并开始回答它们?这些新的概念,术语和设计原则在编辑和出版惯例中意味着什么?借鉴发展的经验:相对论的生活评论,一个创新的在线杂志为物理学,论文讨论了这些后一种问题。本文重点介绍了Livity评论填补的一些信息需求,并解释了指导其设计试图满足这些需求的原则如何。这些设计原则是“协同作用”,“适应性”和信息的“利用率”。此外,本文讨论了一个基本的假设,而不是拥有读者,Living审查具有我们提供研究工具的用户。与我们提供(文学/研究)评论文章的事实结合了这一事实,并且我们在允许多种形式的索引和演示中工作的事实,我们决定将我们的参考信息视为非常重要。本文讨论了我们如何将这些信息视为重要,以及我们预期这种治疗的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号