首页> 外文会议>SAE International Fuels and Lubricants Meeting and Exposition >A comparison of methods for evaluating automatic transmission fluid effects on friction torque capacity - a study by the International Lubricant Standardization and Approval Committee (ILSAC) ATF subcommittee
【24h】

A comparison of methods for evaluating automatic transmission fluid effects on friction torque capacity - a study by the International Lubricant Standardization and Approval Committee (ILSAC) ATF subcommittee

机译:评估自动变速流体效应对摩擦扭矩容量的方法的比较 - 国际润滑油标准化与批准委员会(ILSAC)ATF小组委员会的研究

获取原文

摘要

As part of the International Lubricant Standardization and Approval Committee's (ILSAC) goal of developing a global automatic transmission fluid (ATF) specification, members have been evaluating test methods that are currently used by various automotive manufacturers for qualifying ATF for use in their respective transmissions. This report deals with comparing test methods used for determining torque capacity in friction systems (shifting clutches). Three test methods were compared, the Plate Friction Test from the General Motors DEXRON - III Specification, the Friction Durability Test from the Ford MERCON Specification, and the Japanese Automotive Manufacturers Association Friction Test - JASO Method 348-95. Eight different fluids were evaluated. Friction parameters used in the comparison were breakaway friction, dynamic friction torque at midpoint and the end of engagement, and the ratio of end torque to midpoint torque. Correlation among the three test methods was relatively good in the early portions of the test procedures, however, as tests progressed correlation deteriorated. A "severity index" was developed that might help explain the deterioration in correlation among the three test methods.
机译:作为国际润滑油标准化和审批委员会(ILSAC)制定全球自动变速器(ATF)规范的目标,成员一直在评估目前由各种汽车制造商使用的测试方法,以便在其各自的传输中使用。本报告涉及比较用于确定摩擦系统中扭矩容量的试验方法(移位离合器)。比较了三种试验方法,从通用电机摩洛尔 - III规范中的板式摩擦试验,福特·巯规格的摩擦耐久性试验,以及日本汽车制造商关联摩擦试验 - jaso方法348-95。评估八种不同的液体。比较中使用的摩擦参数是分离的摩擦,在中点处的动态摩擦扭矩和接合结束,以及端部扭矩与中点扭矩的比率。然而,在测试程序的早期部分中,三种测试方法之间的相关性相对较好,然而,随着测试的相关性劣化。开发了一个“严重性指数”,可能有助于解释三种测试方法之间的相关性的恶化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号