【24h】

A TREATISE ON WELD EVALUATION

机译:关于焊接评估的论文

获取原文

摘要

Welds are inspected by various techniques which include visual examination, surface examination and volumetric examination. While the above techniques would qualify a weld to workmanship criteria, they would not necessarily be indicative of weld properties. Preparation and qualification of welding procedures and testing of production welds are indicative that the weldment would probably provide a safe and satisfactory service life. However, weldments have to operate at their design conditions which may include high temperatures and ASME Codes do not necessarily stipulate tests for verification of high temperature properties. In addition, defective welds are often repaired by removing the originally deposited weld metal and re-welding. The effects of double heat input are not necessarily evaluated. In this paper, an insight is provided into the factors which provide assurance that weldments will perform satisfactorily in service and the combination of non-destructive evaluation methods which would enable effective detection of imperfections. Non-destructive volumetric examination method for welds has traditionally be radiography. With the advent of automated data acquisition methods in Ultrasonics, like Time of Flight Diffraction and Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing, these methods are rapidly replacing radiographic methods for weld inspection. Ultrasonic acceptance criteria in ASME Section VIII Div. 1, ASME Section VIII Div. 2 and ASME Section IX do not include evaluation of porosity as ultrasonic methods do not easily detect porosity. The result of all this is that today we are accepting welders qualified using Ultrasonic examination as per ASME Section IX but on the job there is still the option of inspecting the weld using Radiography in which, excessive porosity can be a cause for weld repair. Considering this and various other criteria, a comprehensive weld evaluation methodology is proposed taking advantage of the strengths of each inspection technique while welding technology used would ensure that welds have required properties at service temperatures. A proposal is also made to improve the detectability of imperfections using modifications of existing Ultrasonic A-scan Techniques.
机译:通过各种技术检查焊缝,包括可视化检查,表面检查和体积检查。虽然上述技术将符合工艺标准的焊缝,但它们不一定指示焊接性能。焊接程序的准备和鉴定和生产焊缝的测试表明,焊接可能提供安全令人满意的使用寿命。然而,焊接必须在其设计条件下操作,其可包括高温,并且ASME码不一定规定验证高温性能的测试。此外,通常通过去除最初沉积的焊接金属和再焊接来修复有缺陷的焊缝。不一定评估双热输入的影响。在本文中,提供了一种提供保证的因素,即焊接在服务中令人满意的表现和未破坏性评估方法的组合,这将能够有效地检测缺陷。焊缝的非破坏性体积检查方法传统上是射线照相。随着超声波自动数据采集方法的出现,如飞行时间衍射和相控阵超声波检测,这些方法正在迅速更换焊接检查的射线照相方法。 ASME第VIII Div中的超声波验收标准。 1,ASME部分VIII DIV。 2和ASME部分IX不包括孔隙度评估,因为超声波方法不容易检测孔隙率。所有这一切的结果是,今天我们正在接受使用超声波检查的焊工,根据ASME部分IX,但在工作中仍然可以选择使用放射线照相检查焊缝,其中孔隙率过高可以是焊接修复的原因。考虑到这一点和各种其他标准,提出了一种综合焊接评估方法,利用每种检测技术的优势,同时使用的焊接技术将确保焊缝在维修温度下需要特性。还提出了一种提出使用现有超声波扫描技术的修改来改善缺陷的可检测性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号