首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference >DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF CONCRETE BEAMS EXTERNALLY REINFORCED WITH CARBON FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC (CFRP) SUBJECTED TO IMPULSIVE LOADS
【24h】

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF CONCRETE BEAMS EXTERNALLY REINFORCED WITH CARBON FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC (CFRP) SUBJECTED TO IMPULSIVE LOADS

机译:碳纤维增强塑料(CFRP)对混凝土梁的动态响应经受冲动载荷的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A series of 54 laboratory scale concrete beams 3 × 3 × 30 in (7.62 × 7.62 × 76.2 cm) in size were impulsively loaded to failure in a drop weight impact machine. The beams had no internal reinforcement, but instead were externally reinforced on the bottom or tension side of the beams with 1, 2, and 3 ply AS4C/1919 graphite epoxy panels. In addition, several of the beams were also reinforced on the sides with 3 ply CFRP. The beams were simply supported in a drop weight machine and subjected to impact loads with amplitudes up to 10 kips (44.59kN), and durations less than 1 ms, at beam midspan. Measurements made during the loading event included beam total load, midspan displacement, as well as midspan strain at 3 locations in the beam's cross-section. A high speed framing camera (10,000 frames/sec) was also used to record the beam's displacement-time behavior as well as to gain insight into the failure mechanisms. Beam midspan accelerations were determined by double differentiation of the displacement versus time data, and in turn, the beam's inertial loads were calculated using the beam's equivalent mass. Beam dynamic bending loads versus time were determined from the difference between the total load versus time and the inertial load versus time data. Bending loads versus displacements were also determined along with fracture energies. Failure to correct the loads for inertia will result in incorrect conclusions being drawn from the data, especially for bending resistance of brittle concrete test specimens. A comparison with quasistatic bending (fracture) energy data showed that the dynamic failure energy absorbed by the beams was always less than the static fracture energy, due to the brittle nature of concrete when impulsively loaded.
机译:在下降重量冲击机中冲动尺寸为3×3×30厘米(7.62×7.62×76.2厘米)的54个实验室规模混凝土梁3×3×30)。梁没有内部加强,而是在梁的底部或张力侧的外部加强,其中梁为1,2和3层,3%的AS4C / 1919石墨环氧树脂板。另外,在具有3层CFRP的侧面上也加强了几梁中的几个梁。梁上的梁简单地支撑在滴重型机中,并经受较大幅度的撞击载荷,最高可达10个kips(44.59kn),并且在光束中间横跨小于1 ms的持续时间。在加载事件期间进行的测量包括光束总负载,中间位移以及光束横截面中的3个位置的中间株。高速框架相机(10,000帧/秒)还用于记录光束的位移时间行为以及深入了解故障机制。光束中央加速度由位移与时间数据的双分化确定,又使用光束的等效质量计算光束的惯性载荷。波束动态弯曲载荷与时间与总负载与时间和惯性负载与时间数据之间的差异决定。还与断裂能量相比,弯曲载荷与位移相比。未能纠正惯性的负载将从数据中汲取不正确的结论,特别是对于脆性混凝土测试样品的弯曲电阻。与Quasistatic弯曲(骨折)能量数据的比较表明,由于混凝土冲压时,梁吸收的动态故障能量总是小于静态断裂能量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号