首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Technology and Society Technical Expertise and Public Decisions >The Foz Coa rock art case: towards a new relationship between science and policy making in Portugal?
【24h】

The Foz Coa rock art case: towards a new relationship between science and policy making in Portugal?

机译:FOZ COA岩石艺术案:葡萄牙科学与政策之间的新关系?

获取原文

摘要

In a less-industrialised country like Portugal, the relationships between scientific expertise and the public decision-making system have been negatively marked by the low relevance assigned to science by public decision-makers and by the lack of a scientific culture in society at large. Decision-makers have shown the propensity, either to disregard scientific opinion, or to manipulate it, whenever it does not meet their political objectives. This statement is confirmed by the direction followed by science-based social and political controversies occurred in Portugal in recent years. However, in the Foz Coa rock art controversy (1994-95), pressure by Portuguese archeologists eventually led the new Government, empowered in late 1995, to lean towards their position, which favoured the preservation of the pictures, in spite of the fact that this would imply discontinuing the building up of a dam where important investments had already been made. What does this case tell us about political and administrative culture towards science in a peripheral European country, as well as about the possible consequences of contingent political change in that regard? What can be learned regarding the strategy used by scientists to put forward their claim for the rock paintings preservation? Does this case, and the decisions taken on it, announce a new era in the relationships between scientific expertise and public decision in Portugal?.
机译:在像葡萄牙这样的少产业化国家,科学专业知识与公共决策制度之间的关系受到公共决策者分配给科学的低相关性的负面标志,以及缺乏在社会中缺乏科学文化。决策者已经表现出倾向,无论是忽视科学意见,还是在不符合其政治目标时操纵它。该声明通过方向确认,近年来葡萄牙发生了基于科学的社会和政治争议。然而,在FOZ COA岩石艺术争议(1994-95)中,葡萄牙语考古学家的压力最终导致了新政府,授权于1995年底,倾向于他们的立场,这有利于保护图片,尽管如此这意味着迫切地停止建立一个大坝已经进行了重要投资。这一案子在外围欧洲国家的政治和行政文化方面告诉我们,以及对此方面的政治变革的可能后果如何?有关科学家使用的策略可以汲取什么,提出他们对岩石绘画保存的索赔?如果这种情况,以及对此的决定,宣布了葡萄牙科学专业知识和公共决定之间的关系新的时代吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号