首页> 外文会议>ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition >THE APPLICATION OF PROBABIL ISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT TO HABITABLE PAYLOADS: UTILIZATION OF RISK-BASED AND TRADITIONAL RULE-BASED METHODOLOGIES A 'FIRST' FOR NASA
【24h】

THE APPLICATION OF PROBABIL ISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT TO HABITABLE PAYLOADS: UTILIZATION OF RISK-BASED AND TRADITIONAL RULE-BASED METHODOLOGIES A 'FIRST' FOR NASA

机译:Probabil Istic风险评估在可居住的有效货物中的应用:利用基于风险和基于传统规则的方法的“第一”为NASA

获取原文

摘要

The safety of the public, the astronaut crew, Agency assets, other payloads, and the environment are NASA's priorities when assessing the adequacy of space flight designs. While Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) has been successfully applied to Space Shuttle and Space Station vehicle risk decision-making, the mandated use of a non-probabilistic rule-based approach is unique to the safety certification of NASA's habitable payloads. A 1997 survey of historical safety policies with NASA's Payload Safety Review Panel (PSRP) revealed that the non-probabilistic approach for habitable payloads was not arbitrary but founded on informed risk decisions from 20 years ago by then NASA Headquarters policy makers. Based on a sound payload safety track record, there has been no compelling reason, until recently, to consider expanding from the present NSTS 1700.7B rule-based approach to include risk-based PRA as a viable alternative. However, with the Agency's increased focus on structured risk management, the establishment of a Risk Assessment Program at NASA Headquarters, and refined PRA guidelines and techniques, PRA is now formally recognized as an essential method for evaluating complex and high risk systems. The PSRP recognizes a growing need and an opportunity for evaluating the efficacy of risk-based PRA methods for application to increasingly complex next generation payload technologies. Therefore, it is timely to revisit the potential application of PRA to habitable payloads. This paper discusses PRA as a risk-based method that, when properly implemented, will result in equivalent or improved safety compared with the rule-based failure tolerance requirements for achieving the Agency's "Safety First" core value. The benefits and cautions associated with infusing PRA methodology into the PSRP safety certification process are also discussed, as well as a proposed deployment strategy of how PRA might be prudently tailored and applied to habitable payloads. The use of PRA for assessing payload reliability is unrestricted at NASA but this is beyond the scope of the present discussion of payload safety applications.
机译:公众的安全,宇航员机构,代理资产,其他有效载荷和环境是NASA在评估空间飞行设计的充足性时的优先事项。虽然概率风险评估(PRA)已成功应用于航天飞机和空间站车辆风险决策,但授权使用非概率规则的方法是NASA居住有效载荷的安全认证的独特。 1997年1997年对NASA的有效载荷安全审查小组(PSRP)的历史安全政策调查显示,居住有效载荷的非概率方法并不是任意,但在20年前的风险决策上由当时的NASA总部决策者创立。基于声音有效载荷安全轨道记录,直到最近,没有引人注目的原因,以考虑从现在的第1700.7B规则的规则的方法扩展,包括基于风险的PRA作为可行的替代方案。然而,由于原子能机构增加了对结构性风险管理的重点,在美国宇航局总部设立了风险评估计划,并提高了PRA指南和技术,现在正式认为是评估复杂和高风险系统的基本方法。 PSRP认识到日益增长的需求和评估基于风险的PRA方法效果的机会,以越来越复杂的下一代有效载荷技术。因此,它是及时重新审视PRA潜在应用居住的有效载荷。本文讨论了PRA作为一种基于风险的方法,当正确实施时,将导致等效或改善的安全性,与实现原子能机构的“安全第一”核心价值的规则的失效耐受要求相比。还讨论了与注入PRA方法相关的益处和注意事项,也讨论了PSRP安全认证过程,以及拟议的部署策略如何谨慎地定制和适用于可居住的有效载荷。在美国国家航空航天局不受限制地使用PRA进行评估有效载荷可靠性,但这超出了对有效载荷安全应用的目前讨论的范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号