首页> 外文会议>2002 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition , Nov 17-22, 2002, New Orleans, Louisiana >THE APPLICATION OF PROBABIL ISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT TO HABITABLE PAYLOADS: UTILIZATION OF RISK-BASED AND TRADITIONAL RULE-BASED METHODOLOGIES A 'FIRST' FOR NASA
【24h】

THE APPLICATION OF PROBABIL ISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT TO HABITABLE PAYLOADS: UTILIZATION OF RISK-BASED AND TRADITIONAL RULE-BASED METHODOLOGIES A 'FIRST' FOR NASA

机译:概率性现场风险评估在可承受的有效载荷中的应用:美国国家航空航天局基于风险和传统规则的方法“第一”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The safety of the public, the astronaut crew, Agency assets, other payloads, and the environment are NASA's priorities when assessing the adequacy of space flight designs. While Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) has been successfully applied to Space Shuttle and Space Station vehicle risk decision-making, the mandated use of a non-probabilistic rule-based approach is unique to the safety certification of NASA's habitable payloads. A 1997 survey of historical safety policies with NASA's Payload Safety Review Panel (PSRP) revealed that the non-probabilistic approach for habitable payloads was not arbitrary but founded on informed risk decisions from 20 years ago by then NASA Headquarters policy makers. Based on a sound payload safety track record, there has been no compelling reason, until recently, to consider expanding from the present NSTS 1700.7B rule-based approach to include risk-based PRA as a viable alternative. However, with the Agency's increased focus on structured risk management, the establishment of a Risk Assessment Program at NASA Headquarters, and refined PRA guidelines and techniques, PRA is now formally recognized as an essential method for evaluating complex and high risk systems. The PSRP recognizes a growing need and an opportunity for evaluating the efficacy of risk-based PRA methods for application to increasingly complex next generation payload technologies. Therefore, it is timely to revisit the potential application of PRA to habitable payloads. This paper discusses PRA as a risk-based method that, when properly implemented, will result in equivalent or improved safety compared with the rule-based failure tolerance requirements for achieving the Agency's "Safety First" core value. The benefits and cautions associated with infusing PRA methodology into the PSRP safety certification process are also discussed, as well as a proposed deployment strategy of how PRA might be prudently tailored and applied to habitable payloads. The use of PRA for assessing payload reliability is unrestricted at NASA but this is beyond the scope of the present discussion of payload safety applications.
机译:在评估太空飞行设计的适当性时,公众安全,宇航员,原子能机构的资产,其他有效载荷和环境是NASA的首要任务。尽管概率风险评估(PRA)已成功应用于航天飞机和空间站飞行器风险决策,但强制性使用基于非概率规则的方法是NASA可居住有效载荷安全认证所独有的。 1997年,由NASA的有效载荷安全审查小组(PSRP)对历史安全政策进行的调查显示,针对可居住有效载荷的非概率方法并不是武断的,而是基于20年前当时美国宇航局总部决策者的明智风险决策。基于良好的有效载荷安全跟踪记录,直到最近,没有令人信服的理由考虑从当前的NSTS 1700.7B基于规则的方法扩展到将基于风险的PRA包括在内作为可行的选择。但是,随着原子能机构对结构化风险管理的日益重视,在美国宇航局总部建立风险评估计划以及完善的PRA指南和技术,PRA现在已正式被认为是评估复杂和高风险系统的重要方法。 PSRP认识到了不断增长的需求,并且有机会评估基于风险的PRA方法应用于越来越复杂的下一代有效载荷技术的有效性。因此,适时重新审视PRA在可居住有效载荷方面的潜在应用。本文将PRA讨论为一种基于风险的方法,与基于规则的容错要求相比,如果适当地实施PRA,它将达到同等或更高的安全性,从而实现原子能机构的“安全第一”核心价值。还讨论了将PRA方法引入PSRP安全认证过程的好处和注意事项,以及提议的部署策略,说明如何谨慎地量身定制PRA并将其应用于可居住的有效载荷。在美国国家航空航天局没有限制使用PRA评估有效载荷可靠性,但这超出了当前对有效载荷安全应用的讨论范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号