首页> 外文会议>Conference on computers in cardiology >Archives for coronary angiography: a comparison of cinefilm vs. video vs. digital
【24h】

Archives for coronary angiography: a comparison of cinefilm vs. video vs. digital

机译:冠状动脉血管造影档案:Cinefilm与Vide Vs. Digital的比较

获取原文

摘要

The appropriate storage and archiving of angiographic images and data still represents a major problem in coronary angiography. Usually one of these three physical media is used: cine film, videotape, or digital storage. The properties of these different archive tapes are analyzed by comparing their benefits for clinical practice. The most important criterion for clinical diagnosis is the image quality. Extensive studies have been performed to compare images from digital storage, digitized cine film, VHS videotape, and worn videotape. By using special X-ray phantoms, various image properties were measured. The results show that digital images have the best quality in terms of noise, sharpness, and pointspreading. Cine film has advantages in spatial resolution, but disadvantages in contrast. The video images, especially those from worn tape, have a dramatic loss of spatial resolution and sharpness. Digital technology offers several progressions like online enhancement, fast accessibility, quantitative coronary analysis, data integration, communication, and telemedicine.
机译:血管造影图像和数据的适当存储和存档仍然是冠状动脉造影的主要问题。通常使用这三种物理介质中的一个:Cine Film,VideoTape或数字存储。通过比较它们对临床实践的益处来分析这些不同档案胶带的性质。临床诊断最重要的标准是图像质量。已经进行了广泛的研究,以比较数字存储,数字化电影,VHS录像带和Worn Videopotape的图像。通过使用特殊的X射线幻影,测量各种图像性质。结果表明,数字图像在噪音,清晰度和尺寸方面具有最佳质量。电影薄膜具有空间分辨率的优势,但缺点相比之下。视频图像,尤其是来自磨损的视频,具有急剧丧失空间分辨率和清晰度。数字技术提供了几种进展,如在线增强,快速访问,定量冠状动脉分析,数据集成,通信和远程医疗等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号