首页> 外文会议> >Archives for coronary angiography: a comparison of cinefilm vs. video vs. digital
【24h】

Archives for coronary angiography: a comparison of cinefilm vs. video vs. digital

机译:冠状动脉造影档案:电影胶片,视频胶片和数字胶片的比较

获取原文

摘要

The appropriate storage and archiving of angiographic images and data still represents a major problem in coronary angiography. Usually one of these three physical media is used: cine film, videotape, or digital storage. The properties of these different archive tapes are analyzed by comparing their benefits for clinical practice. The most important criterion for clinical diagnosis is the image quality. Extensive studies have been performed to compare images from digital storage, digitized cine film, VHS videotape, and worn videotape. By using special X-ray phantoms, various image properties were measured. The results show that digital images have the best quality in terms of noise, sharpness, and pointspreading. Cine film has advantages in spatial resolution, but disadvantages in contrast. The video images, especially those from worn tape, have a dramatic loss of spatial resolution and sharpness. Digital technology offers several progressions like online enhancement, fast accessibility, quantitative coronary analysis, data integration, communication, and telemedicine.
机译:血管造影图像和数据的适当存储和归档仍然是冠状动脉血管造影的主要问题。通常使用以下三种物理介质之一:电影胶片,录像带或数字存储。通过比较它们在临床实践中的益处,分析了这些不同存档磁带的特性。临床诊断的最重要标准是图像质量。已经进行了广泛的研究来比较来自数字存储,数字电影胶片,VHS录像带和旧式录像带的图像。通过使用特殊的X射线体模,可以测量各种图像属性。结果表明,就噪声,清晰度和点扩展而言,数字图像具有最佳质量。电影胶片在空间分辨率上具有优势,但相比之下则具有劣势。视频图像,尤其是来自磨损磁带的视频图像,在空间分辨率和清晰度方面都有很大的损失。数字技术提供了多种进步,例如在线增强,快速访问,定量冠状动脉分析,数据集成,通信和远程医疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号