首页> 外文会议>International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications >A Comparative Study on Voxel Classification Methods for Atlas based Segmentation of Brain Structures from 3D MRI Images
【24h】

A Comparative Study on Voxel Classification Methods for Atlas based Segmentation of Brain Structures from 3D MRI Images

机译:3D MRI图像脑结构基于地图集的体素分类方法的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Automatic or interactive segmentation tools for 3D medical images have been developed to help the clinicians. Atlas-based methods are one of the most usual techniques to localized anatomical structures. They have shown to be efficient with various types of medical images and various types of organs. However, a registration step is needed to perform an atlas-based segmentation which can be very time consuming. Local atlases coupled with spatial relationships have been proposed to solve this issue. Local atlases are defined on a sub-part of the image enabling a fast registration step. The positioning of these local atlases on the whole image can be done automatically with learned spatial relationships or interactively by a user when the automatic positioning is not well performed. In this article, different classification methods possibly included in local atlases segmentation methods are compared. Human brain and sheep brain MRI images have been used as databases for the experiments. Depending on the choice of the method, segmentation quality and computation time are very different. Graph-cut or CNN segmentation methods have shown to be more suitable for interactive segmentation because of their low computation time. Multi-atlas based methods like local weighted majority voting are more suitable for automatic process.
机译:已经开发出用于3D医学图像的自动或交互式分割工具来帮助临床医生。基于地图集的方法是局部解剖结构最常见的技术之一。他们已显示有效率有各种类型的医学图像和各种类型的器官。然而,需要注册步骤来执行可以非常耗时的基于地图集的分段。已经提出了与空间关系耦合的本地地图集以解决这个问题。本地附件是在图像的子部分上定义的,启用快速注册步骤。当自动定位没有很好地执行时,可以通过学习的空间关系或交互方式自动地完成整个图像上的这些本地地图集的定位。在本文中,比较了不同的分类方法,可能包含在本地Atlases分段方法中。人脑和绵羊脑MRI图像已被用作实验数据库。根据方法的选择,分割质量和计算时间非常不同。由于其计算时间的低计算时间,图形切割或CNN分段方法已经更适合于交互式分割。基于多标准的方法,如局部加权大多数投票更适合自动过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号