首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions >Sacral Buildings in Slovenia - Seismic Risk Assessment Through Simplified Methodologies
【24h】

Sacral Buildings in Slovenia - Seismic Risk Assessment Through Simplified Methodologies

机译:斯洛文尼亚的骶骨建筑 - 通过简化的方法进行地震风险评估

获取原文

摘要

In this paper seismic vulnerability of sacral buildings in seismic prone areas is-discussed. In Slovenia there are more than 2900 sacral buildings, for which there is no database of their current condition or vulnerability. On the sample of 64 Slovenian religious buildings (different architectural styles) the use of different simple methods for seismic risk assessment of sacral architecture is demonstrated. The emphasize is on quick and simple methods, which on the basis of the basic data of the asset can provide seismic risk assessment that will serve mainly to identify the most critical buildings. For this purpose, methods of Lourenco (2005) and Lagomarsino (2004) were used. The results of different methods are compared and advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. Following the analysis on sample of 64 buildings it may be concluded that the percentage of buildings at risk in Slovenia may vary between 44% and 89% depending on the method used. Method relying on 73 index provide the most conservative results, while the method with 71 index provide very optimistic results in comparison to the results of macroseismic methodology provided by RISK-UE. It is also shown that some of conceptually completely different methodologies may provide comparable results. Comparison with the results from non-linear analysis on sample of 15 buildings according to EC8-3 provisions shows that simplified methodology with 73 index on average provide the most consistent results.
机译:在讨论了地震俯卧区中骶骨建筑的地震脆弱性。在斯洛文尼亚有超过2900个骶骨建筑物,其中没有数据库他们的现状或脆弱性。对64个斯洛文尼亚宗教建筑(不同建筑款式)的样本,证明了使用不同简单的骶骨建筑地震风险评估方法。强调是快速而简单的方法,这在基本数据的基础上,资产的基本数据可以提供地震风险评估,这些风险评估将主要用于识别最关键的建筑物。为此目的,使用劳伦诺(2005)和Lagomarsino(2004)的方法。比较不同方法的结果,并讨论了每种方法的优点和缺点。在分析64个建筑物的分析之后,可以得出结论,斯洛文尼亚风险面临的建筑物的百分比可以根据所使用的方法而有所不同。依赖于73指数的方法提供了最保守的结果,而具有71指标的方法提供了非常乐观的结果,与风险-UE提供的宏观主义方法的结果相比。还表明,一些概念上完全不同的方法可以提供可比结果。根据EC8-3规定,与15个建筑物样本的非线性分析结果的比较表明,平均值的简化方法具有73指数,提供了最一致的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号