首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Advanced Materials and Engineering Materials >Comparison of Three Commercial Latex and Non-Latex Orthodontic Elastic Bands
【24h】

Comparison of Three Commercial Latex and Non-Latex Orthodontic Elastic Bands

机译:三种商用乳胶和非胶乳正畸弹性带的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Orthodontic elastic bands are commonly made from natural rubber because they provide high resiliency at a reasonable cost. However, hypersensitivity related to protein present in latex have been reported in some patients which has led to increased usage of non-latex elastic alternatives. Therefore, the assessment of their mechanical properties is of importance. The objective of this study was to compare the physical and mechanical properties of three commercial latex and non-latex type orthodontic elastic bands. Samples of latex and non-latex type orthodontic elastics from manufacturers - AO (6.5oz), MASEL (6.0oz), GAC (6.0oz), with 3/16-inch diameter were selected. Firstly, the physical characteristics (width, cross-sectional thickness, and inner diameter) of the elastic bands were determined, following which their mechanical properties [initial extension force (FO), 24 h- residual force (F24), percentage of force decay, force exerted at 3 times the inner diameter (F3xID) and breaking force] were tested. The data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test and multiple comparisons among the groups were done with Kruskal-Wallis Test (p< 0.05). Significant differences were found in the physical characteristics and mechanical properties among each brand and type of elastics. AO elastic bands had significantly low FO and F24 compared with the others. While the percentage of force decay at 24 h was greatest in AO followed by MASEL and GAC. Non-latex type elastics showed greater force decay than latex type ones, approximately 30-40% and 20-30% of the initial force in non-latex and latex type elastic, respectively. AO elastics showed the highest F3xID and also the lowest breaking force. Overall, non-latex type elastics exhibited lower breaking force compared to latex type ones. Wide variations were observed in the physical and mechanical characteristics among same manufacturer and same elastic type. All commercial brands presented higher F3xID than that stated by the manufacturers. Non-latex type elastics showed greater force decay over 24 h than latex type ones. The differences in the properties between the 2 types of the elastics could be due to the differences in their structure and polymers composition.
机译:因为它们提供以合理的成本高弹性正畸松紧带通常由天然橡胶制成的。然而,在乳胶与存在的蛋白过敏症已经报道了一些患者已导致非乳胶的弹性替代品的使用增加。因此,其机械性能的评估是很重要的。这项研究的目的是比较三个商业乳胶和非乳胶型正畸松紧带的物理和机械性能。从制造商的胶乳和非乳胶型正畸弹性体的样品 - AO(6.5盎司),MASEL(6.0盎司)GAC(6.0盎司),3/16英寸的直径被选定。首先,弹性带被确定的物理特性(宽度,横截面厚度和内径),之后它们的机械性能[初始伸展力(FO),24 H-残余力(F24),力衰减的百分比在内径3次(F3xID)和断裂力施加的力]进行测试。数据用的基团中的Mann-Whitney U检验和多重比较用Kruskal-Wallis检验(P <0.05)进行分析。显著差异在弹性件的每个品牌和类型之间的物理特性和机械性能被发现。与其他人相比AO橡皮筋有显著低FO和F24。虽然力衰减的,在24小时的比例是最大的AO其次MASEL和GAC。非乳胶型弹性表现出更大的力衰减比乳胶型的,约30-40%,而在非胶乳的初始力的20-30%,分别胶乳型弹性。 AO弹性表现出最高的F3xID,也是最低的破断力。总体而言,非乳胶型弹性体相比,胶乳类型的部分表现出较低的断裂力。在相同的制造商和相同的弹性类型之间的物理和机械特性,观察到宽的变化。所有的商业品牌呈现比由制造商声明更高F3xID。非乳胶型弹性表现出更大的力衰减在比乳胶型的人24小时。在2种类型的弹性件之间的特性的差异可能是由于在它们的结构和聚合物组合物的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号