首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environmental Engineering >Comparison on Effects of Different Sampling Methods for the Disinfection of Ventilator Pipes
【24h】

Comparison on Effects of Different Sampling Methods for the Disinfection of Ventilator Pipes

机译:不同采样方法对呼吸机消毒效果的比较

获取原文

摘要

Different sampling methods were used to collect samples from ventilator pipes after they were sterilized for selecting an optimal sampling method for the disinfection of ventilator pipes. 200 sets of the ventilator pipes used in clinic were randomly divided into group A and B. The pipes in group A were washed by hand and disinfected by the immersion disinfection method with strongly acidic ionized-water; those in group B were washed with automatic cleaning machine and sterilized with an autoclave. After the disinfection, the samples were collected with a shallow-swabbed, lavage and deep-swabbed, respectively, and the collected samples were sent to the microbiology laboratory for bacterial culture to confirm the disinfection. The results showed that qualified rates of the disinfection with the different sampling methods in group A and B were 98.32% and 100% for shallow-swabbed method, 98.32% and 100% for lavage, and 76.22% and 92.67% for deep-swabbed method, respectively. It is indicated that disinfection effects with the different sampling methods for the disinfection of ventilator pipes should be significantly different and the sampling with deep-swabbed method can objectively reflect the disinfecting effect of the ventilator pipe.
机译:在对呼吸机灭菌的最佳采样方法进行灭菌后,使用不同的取样方法来收集来自呼吸机管的样品。临床中使用的200组呼吸机管被随机分为A组和B. A组中的管道用手洗涤,并通过浸入式消毒方法用强酸性离子水消毒; B组中的那些用自动清洁机洗涤,并用高压釜灭菌。消毒后,分别将样品分别用浅刷,灌洗和深擦拭,并将收集的样品送到微生物实验室以进行细菌培养,以确认消毒。结果表明,浅刷布法,A组和B组中不同取样方法的消毒率为98.32%,100%,灌洗的98.32%和100%,为深刷布法为76.22%和92.67% , 分别。结果表明,对呼吸机管道消毒的不同采样方法的消毒效应应显着不同,用深刷布方法采样可以客观地反映呼吸机管道的消毒效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号