首页> 外文会议>Conference on Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction >Life cycle assessment of alternative processes to treat fly ash from waste incineration
【24h】

Life cycle assessment of alternative processes to treat fly ash from waste incineration

机译:从废物焚烧治疗粉煤灰的替代过程的生命周期评估

获取原文

摘要

Unsustainable consumption and production patterns, together with industrialization and population growth, have increased the generation of municipal solid waste (MSW), causing several environmental problems. Current global MSW generation levels are approximately 1.3 billion tonnes per year, and are expected to increase to approximately 2.2 billion tonnes per year by 2025 [1]. In this sense, waste management is one of the most complex environmental challenges faced by modern societies. The European Waste Framework Directive (WFD) [3] is promoting a more sustainable performance, reducing waste generation and connecting resource use and waste residuals. WFD sets waste prevention, preparation for reuse and waste recycling as priority strategies. Nevertheless, recycling and reuse are not always suitable for all waste streams; and thus, a great amount of MSW ends up in landfills and waste-to-energy (WtE) plants, considered by European policies as last-resort options. WtE plants are one of the most robust waste treatment, which not only reduces waste volume, but also allows efficient recovery of energy [2]. However, incineration results in various types of solid wastes, primarily including bottom, boiler and fly ashes [3]. Fly ashes (FAs) represent only a few percent of the input waste. They are fine and are normally characterised by a high content of chlorides and significant amounts of dangerous substances, such as heavy metals or organic compounds. Due to its composition, FA must be treated in order to reduce its toxicity and to avoid negative impacts on the environment and human health. The application of a certain treatment may have two approaches: ensure landfilling of FA in non-hazardous landfills or improve the possibilities of its valorisation [4]. Regarding the former, FA are often treated by means of separation processes, stabilisation/solidification (S/S), thermal treatments or combined treatments. Among S/S alternatives, stabilisation with cement and carbonation are one of the most popular.
机译:不可持续的消费和生产模式以及产业化和人口增长,增加了城市固体废物(MSW)的产生,导致了几个环境问题。目前的全球MSW生成水平每年约为13亿吨,预计2025年将增加到每年约22亿吨[1]。从这个意义上讲,废物管理是现代社会面临的最复杂的环境挑战之一。欧洲废物框架指令(WFD)[3]正在促进更可持续的性能,减少废物产生和连接资源使用和废物残留物。 WFD集废物预防,准备重用和废物回收作为优先级的策略。然而,回收和重用并不总是适合所有废物流;因此,大量的MSW最终由欧洲政策视为最后的度假胜地的垃圾填埋场和垃圾到能量(WTE)植物。 WTE工厂是最强大的废物处理之一,不仅减少了废物量,而且还允许有效地回收能量[2]。然而,焚烧导致各种类型的固体废物,主要包括底部,锅炉和飞灰[3]。飞灰(FAS)只代表输入浪费的几个百分点。它们很好,通常是氯化物高含量和大量的危险物质,例如重金属或有机化合物。由于其组成,必须对此进行处理,以减少其毒性,并避免对环境和人类健康产生负面影响。某种治疗的应用可能有两种方法:确保在非危险垃圾填埋场中的FA填埋或改善其瓣膜化的可能性[4]。关于前者,通常通过分离过程,稳定/凝固(S / S),热处理或组合治疗治疗FA。在S / S替代方案中,用水泥和碳酸化稳定是最受欢迎的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号