首页> 外文会议>Kongress Simulation und Erprobung in der Fahrzeugentwicklung >Different methods for road load determination in comparison: Wind tunnel, Wind tunnel method according to WLTP and Coastdown method
【24h】

Different methods for road load determination in comparison: Wind tunnel, Wind tunnel method according to WLTP and Coastdown method

机译:相比之下的道路载荷测定方法:风洞,风洞方法,根据WLTP和乘法方法

获取原文

摘要

This article shows that is generally possible to determine the total road load of a vehicle with the AEROLAB method, whereby the residual brake forces are measured at the flat belt dynamometer. The maximum deviation between this method and the Coastdown method is 3% at the velocities of 20 and 30 km/h and so the difference in cycle energy between this method and the Coastdown method is only -0.6% for the investigated vehicle. Additionally, it is pointed out that the gear transmission oil temperatures, the tyre tread temperatures, the ride height change and the surface structure of the road or rather the test bench belts have a significant influence on the absolute value of the determined road load of a vehicle.
机译:本文示出了通常可以用AERORAB方法确定车辆的总路载荷,由此在平皮带测力计处测量残余制动力。该方法和海岸方法之间的最大偏差为20%和30 km / h的速度为3%,因此该方法与沿海方法之间的循环能量差异仅为-0.6%-0.6%。另外,指出,齿轮传动油温,轮胎胎面温度,骑行高度变化和道路的表面结构或测试台面带对确定的路径的绝对值有显着影响车辆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号