【24h】

ASPECTS OF RISKS IN PETRO-CHEMICAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

机译:石油化学建筑项目风险的方面

获取原文

摘要

Which construction projects are more "riskier" when comparing projects executed in the petrochemical environment and projects executed in general, in South Africa? What makes this question difficult to answer is that in previous research, typical risk categories has been identified for construction projects executed worldwide, but from a literature review conducted, it was found that no standard risk categories exist, thus making it difficult to compare the two industries. In this paper we compare construction project risks faced within the petro-chemical environment with construction project risks faced in general and then determine which industry is inherently a more "riskier" construction project environment, in South Africa. A Qualitative survey-type research was conducted whereby secondary data was collected through an in-depth literature review and primary data collected primarily through electronic surveys, interviews were conducted were practical and through participant observation. Two hypotheses were formulated in order to statistically test primary data collected. Hypothesis 1 follows; Construction related risks faced for projects executed in the petro-chemical environment in RSA are similar to projects executed in general and Hypothesis 2; Construction related risks for projects executed in the petro-chemical environment in RSA are higher than projects executed in general. Some of the key findings from the research concluded that the risk management process is clearly defined and accepted as the norm, but no standard risk categories exist in current theory. Hypotheses testing conducted, resulted in the acceptance of both Hypothesis 1 and 2, which in turn met the set research objectives. This paper is of particular relevance to project and risk management disciplines, contributing towards globalization of standard risk categories as well as giving insight into estimating and pricing for risk within the construction project environments. Benefits from this paper include proposed standardized risk categories to be used as a risk management tool for identifying risks, methods of pricing/estimating for risk and a rare insight into the average percentage of contingency allowance allowed for, for construction projects executed in both the petro-chemical environment and in general in South Africa.
机译:在将一般在南非执行的石化环境和项目中的项目中进行比较时,哪些建筑项目更为“风险化”?是什么让这个问题很难回答的是,在以前的研究中,已经确定了全球所执行的建设项目的典型风险类别,但是从进行的文献审查中发现,没有存在任何标准风险类别,因此难以比较两种标准风险类别行业。在本文中,我们将建设项目风险与一般建筑项目风险面临的建筑项目风险相比,并确定哪个行业在南非的内部是一个“冒险”建设项目环境。进行了定性调查型研究,其中通过深入文献综述收集了二级数据,主要通过电子调查收集的主要数据,采访是实用的,通过参与者观察。配制了两个假设,以便在统计上测试主要数据。假设1跟随;在RSA中石油化学环境中执行的项目面临的建筑相关风险与一般和假设2执行的项目类似; RSA中石油化学环境中执行的项目的建设相关风险高于一般执行的项目。研究中的一些主要发现得出结论认为,风险管理过程明确定义并被接受为常态,但目前没有标准的风险类别存在。假设测试进行了检测,导致假设1和2的接受,这反过来符合设定的研究目标。本文是特别相关的项目和风险管理的学科,对标准风险类别的全球化贡献以及给予洞察评估和定价的建设项目环境中的风险。从本文的优点包括提出标准化的风险类别用作一种风险管理工具,用于识别风险,定价的方法/估算风险和罕见的洞察允许应急准备金的平均百分比,同时在石油执行建设项目 - 南非的化学环境和一般。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号