首页> 外文会议>Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and Annual Meeting >Q inversion and comparative analysis among three methods for VSP data: CFS, SR and AA
【24h】

Q inversion and comparative analysis among three methods for VSP data: CFS, SR and AA

机译:q VSP数据三种方法中的反转和比较分析:CFS,SR和AA

获取原文

摘要

The seismic attenuation characterized by Quality Factor (Q), is one of the key properties to reveal different stratums. This paper is aimed at discussing influencing factors of Q inversion and providing references for practical application. We elaborate three different methods to inverse Q value with VSP data, including Centroid Frequency Shift (CFS) method, Spectral Ratio (SR) method, and Amplitude Attenuation (AA) method. Comparison between the results from CFS with the other two methods is conducted on frequency band width, high Q value layers, wave field components, interface interference and thin layers. Results show that, CFS method is more stable and accurate than the other two methods for dealing with different wavefields, thin and high Q layers. Frequency band width influences inversed effects of all the three methods. The band wider, the results better. Moreover, from the application of a series of field VSP data, we can see that the Q curve of CFS method coincides with geological layers better than those of the others, which are hardly to reflect the main attenuation trend.
机译:以质量因子(Q)为特征的地震衰减是揭示不同层的关键特性之一。本文旨在讨论Q反转的影响因素,并为实际应用提供参考。我们用VSP数据详细说明三种不同的方法,包括质心频移(CFS)方法,光谱比(SR)方法和幅度衰减(AA)方法。与其他两种方法的CFS结果之间的比较是在频带宽度,高Q值层,波场分量,接口干扰和薄层上进行的。结果表明,CFS方法比其他两种处理不同的波场,薄和高Q层更稳定和准确。频段宽度影响所有三种方法的反向效果。乐队更宽,结果更好。此外,从应用一系列现场VSP数据,我们可以看到CFS方法的Q曲线与地质层比其他地质层一致,几乎不会反映主要衰减趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号