首页> 外文会议>Center for Chemical Process Safety International Conference >The Use of Familiar Tool to Diffuse the Feeling of Unease Relating to the Possible Non-Dependability of Barriers of Protection
【24h】

The Use of Familiar Tool to Diffuse the Feeling of Unease Relating to the Possible Non-Dependability of Barriers of Protection

机译:使用熟悉的工具来扩散与可能的保护障碍的不可依赖性的不可易行的感觉

获取原文

摘要

Despite the efforts that many organizations have put into the implementation of Process Safety Management system, there are still opportunities for unintended deviations of controls to occur, primarily due to their deterioration over time and the lack of discipline in their maintenance. These deviations from design intent tend to get normalized and as a result, the controls may not function as intended when in demand. Consequently, process hazards wait like ticking time bombs to be discovered. Process Safety observation, in contrast to employee safety observation, is an important tool that can help address issues associated with normalization of deviations and enhance operational discipline. Workplace observations in general are intended to provide an opportunity to engage managers and supervisors in a meaningful way to recognize safe behaviors and gain commitment to continue to work safely. The onus is on supervision to engage the employees to prevent injuries. However, when it comes to managing operational risks, initiatives around personnel safety are only part of the story. A robust process safety management system is foundational to manage operational risks. Unfortunately, process safety management is often viewed as a complex program primarily owned by technical personnel and engineers. In reality, every employee has a role in preventing process safety incidents. Unlike personnel behavior-based risks, however, process risks are generally 'less visible'. As well, the focus of process safety management is to prevent low frequency-high consequence events as opposed to high frequency-low consequence events that behavioral safety addresses. While many organizations have behavioral observation programs, the need for process safety observations has not been felt. Learning from past incidents, one can clearly see that one of the critical factors that contribute to catastrophic incidents is the lack of operational discipline resulting in the deterioration of controls due to deviations from design intent. To address this requires frequent engagement of managers, supervisors, and employees to proactively identify deviations from design intent to understand the consequences associated with such deviations and correct them. This process contributes to significant increase in process hazard awareness. In this paper, a way of conducting observations that focus on barriers of protections will be discussed. The technique still relies on the importance of conversations. Readers will see how this process can increase process hazard awareness and help reduce operational risks by ensuring that protection barriers function properly when needed.
机译:尽管许多组织已经投入实施过程安全管理系统的努力,但仍有机会对控制的意外偏差发生,主要是由于它们随着时间的推移和缺乏维护缺乏纪律而缺乏。从设计意图的这些偏差往往会被归一化,结果,控制器可能无法按照需求时按预期起作用。因此,过程危险等待被发现的滴答时间炸弹。与员工安全观察相比,过程安全观察是一个重要的工具,可以帮助解决与偏差的正常化相关的问题,并加强业务纪律。工作场所观察一般旨在为有意义的方式提供有意义的方式来聘请经理和监督员来识别安全行为,并致力于安全地工作。 ONU是对员工进行监督,以防止伤害。但是,在管理业务风险方面,人员安全的举措只是故事的一部分。强大的过程安全管理系统是管理运营风险的基础。不幸的是,过程安全管理通常被视为主要由技术人员和工程师拥有的复杂计划。实际上,每个员工都在防止过程安全事件方面发挥作用。然而,与基于人员的行为的风险不同,流程风险通常“不太可见”。同样,过程安全管理的焦点是防止低频高后果事件与行为安全地址的高频率低后果事件相反。虽然许多组织具有行为观察计划,但尚未感受到对过程安全观察的需求。从过去的事件中学习,可以清楚地看到有助于灾难性事件的关键因素之一是由于与设计意图的偏差导致控制的恶化导致控制的缺乏。为了解决这一切,需要经常参与管理人员,主管和员工,主动地识别与设计意图的偏差,了解与此类偏差相关的后果并纠正它们。该过程有助于重大增加过程危险意识。在本文中,将讨论将重点关注保护障碍的观察方法。该技术仍然依赖于对话的重要性。读者将看到该过程如何提高过程危险意识,并通过确保在需要时确保保护障碍功能来减少运营风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号