首页> 外文会议>Center for Chemical Process Safety International Conference >A Prudent Approach to Revalidating Process Hazard Analysis
【24h】

A Prudent Approach to Revalidating Process Hazard Analysis

机译:促进过程危害分析的谨慎方法

获取原文

摘要

The Chemical Process Industry (CPI) has long recognized the necessity of periodically revalidating Process Hazard Analyses (PHAs), such as Hazard and Operability Studies and What-if analyses. CCPS has published a book which describes this work process titled Revalidating Process Hazard Analyses. However there is limited guidance for revalidating supplemental risk analyses. The objectives of performing periodic revalidations are to address the cumulative changes in risk that occur over time and to continuously improve our understanding of that risk. The ultimate goal of any Process Hazard Analysis is to avoid incidents. The purpose of Process Hazards Analysis (PHA) is to identify and understand the hazards associated with the process being reviewed, to understand the potential resultant hazardous events, and to prevent those events by identifying all the potential routes to those events and ensuring that adequate safeguards are in place to mitigate their risk. The application of a suitable hazards evaluation methodology (e.g., Hazard and Operability [HAZOP], Failure Mode and Effect Analysis [FMEA], What If, Checklist) is a core process of the PHA. All of the most-used methodologies are ultimately just different ways of asking "What If questions. The key to success is asking (and, of course, correctly answering) the "right" What If questions. This paper will look at how a variation on an old theme can significantly improve the likelihood of asking all of the right questions, in a way that capitalizes on the strengths of some of the other approaches while avoiding their weaknesses. The work process mentioned in this paper will be illustrated with actual field examples and case studies. This paper will guide PSM managers, Health and Safety (HS) managers, Process Hazard Analysis team leaders in effective preparation before and during a PHA meeting and thereby can reduce the total PHA resources hours required. The work process furnishes a company with an effective tool for revalidating a Process Hazard Analysis that will not only be in compliance with regulation, but will provide a basis for maintaining process, production and facility equipments in a reliable and safe operating condition.
机译:化学工艺行业(CPI)长期以来,已经认识到必须定期重新验收过程危害分析(PHA),例如危害和可操作性研究以及什么 - 如果分析。 CCP已发布一本书,该书描述了题为Reverathating Process危险分析的此工作流程。然而,对撤消补充风险分析有限的指导。执行定期重新验证的目标是解决随着时间的推移发生的风险的累积变化,并不断提高我们对这种风险的理解。任何过程危害分析的最终目标是避免事故。过程危险分析(PHA)的目的是识别和理解与正在审查的过程相关的危害,以了解潜在的危险事件,并通过识别这些事件的所有潜在路线来防止这些事件并确保足够的保障措施到位以减轻他们的风险。合适的危害评估方法的应用(例如,危险与可操作性(HAZOP),故障模式和效果分析[FMEA],什么如果检查表)是PHA的核心处理。所有最常用的方法都是最终的询问“如果是疑问的话。成功的关键是询问(当然,正确地回答)”正确的回答“如果问题为什么。本文将研究如何变化在旧主题上,可以显着提高询问所有正确问题的可能性,以一种方式利用一些其他方法的优势,同时避免了他们的弱点。本文提到的工作过程将用实际的实际例子说明和案例研究。本文将指导PSM经理,健康和安全(HS)管理人员,在PHA会议之前和期间的有效准备中的过程危险分析团队领导者,从而可以减少所需的PHA资源总数。工艺提供公司有一个有效的工具,用于重新验证过程危险分析,不仅符合规定,而且将为维护过程,生产和投标提供依据TY设备采用可靠和安全的操作条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号