首页> 外文会议>IAEE International Conference >THE SUPPLY OF ENERGY SERVICES : DO LOCAL SERVICE PROVIDERS USE DSO OR TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK
【24h】

THE SUPPLY OF ENERGY SERVICES : DO LOCAL SERVICE PROVIDERS USE DSO OR TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK

机译:能源服务供应:当地服务提供商使用DSO或电信网络

获取原文

摘要

The deployment of smart technologies in energy sector and environmental or energy policy goals have increase the role of information needed to deliver energy services to end users. However, electricity firms need to overpass uncertainty linked to new business models, expected regulations and potential entrants, which are some factors from all those that inhibit the smart grid transition (Shomali and Pinkse, 2016). Namely, Local Service Providers (LSPs) could offer several energy services to inform consumers and to help them improve their overall energy efficiency. These services could be of a wide range, using sensors to manage consumption of appliances. Relying on energy boxes or smart meters, they could use different kind of user interface to display consumers’ energy data, such as an in home display or an Internet platform. To provide these services and thus manage a bidirectional transfer of data, LSPs could use mainly two networks. The first one is the Distribution System Operator (DSO) network, wich could be used to send signals or informations to consumers, through for instance any in home display connected to the smart meter. They also could use the household electricity network with smart meters to receive some informations on consumption or directly manage some appliances, as it is currently done for water-heater under time of use tariffs. As the business of the DSO is regulated, LSPs should pay a regulated access fee to use the electricity network. Beside the DSO network, LSPs could also use the “classic” telecommunication network, using for instance an energy box connected to the consumers’ Internet access. In this case, LSPs do not contract with the DSO but directly with consumers : on the one hand to provide the expected energy services and on the other hand to use a defined bandwith of their Internet access. In that case, LSPs could have to compensate consumers for that bandwith. If not, LSPs could directly contract with Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to use a defined bandwith at a negociated price, the Internet sector being competitive. Two effects could be observed following this negociation. The first one is that the Internet access price could drive the supply of energy services if the two networks are not substitute. Thus, ISPs market power impacts the LSPs activity on the energy sector. The second one is that if LSPs widely use the Internet network, ISPs must invest and develop it to make sure energy services could be served. Then, ISPs must recover their additional investment costs (Heidell and Ware, 2010).
机译:在能源部门和环境或能源政策目标中部署智能技术已经增加了向最终用户提供能源服务所需的信息的作用。然而,电力公司需要立交出与新商业模式的不确定性,预期的法规和潜在进入者,这是所有抑制智能电网转换的所有因素(Shomali和Pinkse,2016)。即,当地服务提供商(LSP)可以提供几种能源服务,以告知消费者,并帮助他们提高整体能源效率。这些服务可能具有广泛的范围,使用传感器来管理设备的消耗。依靠能量箱或智能电表,他们可以使用不同类型的用户界面来显示消费者的能源数据,例如家庭显示或互联网平台。提供这些服务,从而管理数据的双向传输,LSP可以主要使用两个网络。第一个是分配系统运算符(DSO)网络,可以用来将信号或信息发送给消费者,通过例如连接到智能仪表的家庭显示器中的任何。他们还可以使用智能电表的家庭电力网络来收到一些有关消费信息或直接管理一些设备的信息,因为它目前正在为使用关税时的热水器完成。由于DSO的业务受到监管,LSP应支付监管的访问费以使用电力网络。除DSO网络外,LSP还可以使用“经典”电信网络,使用例如连接到消费者的Internet访问的能量盒。在这种情况下,LSP不会与DSO合同,但直接与消费者合同:一方面提供预期的能源服务,另一方面使用其互联网接入的定义范围。在这种情况下,LSP可能必须补偿该带的消费者。如果不是,LSP可以直接与互联网服务提供商(ISP)合同,以便以互联的价格使用界限,互联网部门具有竞争力。在这一结束后可以观察到两种效果。第一个是,如果两个网络不替代,则互联网访问价格可能会推动能源服务的供应。因此,ISPS市场权力会影响能源部门的LSP活动。第二个是,如果LSP广泛使用互联网网络,ISP必须投资并开发它以确保可以提供能源服务。然后,ISP必须恢复其额外投资成本(Heidell和Ware,2010)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号