首页> 外文会议>IAEE International Conference >‘AVAILABILITY’ AND/OR ‘AFFORDABILITY’: ADDRESSING STATE LEVEL HOUSEHOLD ENERGY SECURITY IN INDIA
【24h】

‘AVAILABILITY’ AND/OR ‘AFFORDABILITY’: ADDRESSING STATE LEVEL HOUSEHOLD ENERGY SECURITY IN INDIA

机译:“可用性”和/或“负担能力”:在印度寻址国家级别的家庭能源安全性

获取原文

摘要

Energy security is one of the primary economic, political as well as development agenda for all the counties. While the issue is mostly discussed in terms of availability, accessibility, affordability, acceptability and applicability (of energy technology)(Cherp and Jewell, 2014, Yao and Chang, 2014), the implications vary significantly with the change in the country and the stakeholders. While geopolitics is one of the major discourses within which energy availability and affordability are discussed from the macro-perspective of a country, microeconomic studies become equally relevant to understand the same from the perspective of the dwellers in the country. In fact, given the seventh Sustainable Development Goal of access to ‘affordable and clean energy’ (UNDP, 2015), it is important to understand energy security from a micro perspective for developing countries like India with 1.3 billion people and counting faces with the daunting task of providing access to energy in the most basic form (fuels required for cooking and lighting) to its people.India still houses around 65% of households using firewood and chips as primary source of energy for cooking, while 100% household electrification still remains unachieved.Different schemes have been launched from time to time to increase the penetration of LPG (like Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitrak 2009, Pradhan Mantri UjjwalaYojana 2016) as a cleaner cooking fuel as compared to kerosene and fuel-wood and electricity as primary source of lighting (Deen Dyal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana (DDUGJY), Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli Har Ghar Yojana (SAUBHAGYA)). While policies towards LPG penetration emphasized on increase in the supply density and subsidy; policies towards electricity emphasized on greater connectivity and providing initial infrastructure at a lower cost. So basically these policies are aiming at increasing ‘availability’ and ‘affordability’ of LPG and electricity. Against this backdrop, this paper focuses to understand the role of ‘availability’ and ‘affordability’ in determining the use of these two fuels in various states in India. The question that the paper addresses is what leads to increased use of electricity as lighting fuel and LPG as cooking fuel in India Whether it’s the greater availability manifested in increased supply conditions or affordability, manifested in enhanced demand conditions
机译:能源安全是主要的经济,政治和发展所有县议程之一。尽管这一问题在可用性,可及性,可负担性,可接受性和适用性(能源技术)(CHERP和朱厄尔,2014年,姚明和昌,2014)的条款主要是讨论,其意义与在该国的变化和利益相关者显著变化。虽然地缘政治是其内能源供应和承受能力是从国家的宏观角度讨论的主要话语之一,微观经济研究成为理解从该国居民的角度看同一个同样重要。事实上,由于进入“负担得起的清洁能源”(UNDP,2015)的第七可持续发展目标,从微观角度理解能源安全的发展像印度这样的国家拥有13十亿人计数是很重要的面临着艰巨在最基本的形式提供访问能量(用于烹饪和照明所需的燃料)到其周围people.India使用木柴和芯片作为用于烹饪能量主源户的65%仍然房屋的任务,而100%的家用电气化仍然unachieved.Different方案已被从时间推出时间增加LPG的渗透(如甘地Gramin LPG Vitrak 2009,普拉丹Mantri UjjwalaYojana 2016)作为清洁烹饪燃料相比,煤油和燃料木材和电力作为主要来源照明(迪恩Dyal乌帕德亚雅革兰氏乔蒂由旬(DDUGJY),普拉丹Mantri Sahaj Bijli的Har加尔由旬(SAUBHAGYA))。虽然对LPG渗透政策对供应密度和补贴的增加强调;对电力政策强调了更好的连接性,并以较低的成本提供了最初的基础设施。所以基本上这些政策旨在提高“可用性”和液化石油气和电的“承受能力”。在此背景下,本文着重了解在确定印度在各种状态下使用这两种燃料的“可用性”和“承受能力”的作用。现在的问题,该文件的地址是什么导致用电增加作为照明燃料和液化石油气作为烹调在印度无论燃料是在更高的可用性增加供给条件或支付能力表现出来,表现在加强需求状况

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号