首页> 外文会议>ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems >Let Us Say What We Mean: Towards Operational Definitions for Techno-Spirituality Research
【24h】

Let Us Say What We Mean: Towards Operational Definitions for Techno-Spirituality Research

机译:让我们说出我们的意思:对于技术灵性研究的运作定义

获取原文

摘要

Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in HCI research on the use of technology in spiritual practices and environments. Some of these works cover spiritual/transcendent experiences associated with these contexts, but strikingly few of them describe in any way the experiences they studied or aimed to support, let alone give definitions of the terms they use for those experiences. Even fewer papers cite any literature on the relevant experiences. We have to ask: How do the authors understand the experiences their work is aiming to observe, invite, or support? How do they know when and whether they have observed, invited, or supported the kinds of experiences they target? How do they know what they are studying? This paper discusses the presence and absence of definitions of terms for spiritual/transcendent experiences in HCI research, and of citations of relevant literature. It speculates about possible reasons for the oversight, proposes some definitions aimed at filling the gap, and suggests an approach to operationalizing some of the proposed definitions.
机译:近年来,HCI对精神实践和环境中技术使用的研究急剧增加。其中一些作品涵盖了与这些背景相关的精神/超越体验,但它们中的一些人以任何方式描述他们所学习或旨在支持的经验,更不用说,更不用说定义他们为这些经历所用的条款。即使有关相关经验的任何文献也更少。我们要问:作者如何了解他们的工作旨在观察,邀请或支持的经验?他们如何了解他们何时以及他们是否已经观察过,邀请或支持他们瞄准的经验?他们如何知道他们正在学习什么?本文讨论了HCI研究中的精神/超越经验的术语的存在和缺乏定义,以及相关文献的引文。它推测了监督可能的可能原因,提出了一些旨在填补差距的定义,并提出了一种运作一些拟议定义的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号