首页> 外文会议>ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems >What If We Ask A Different Question?: Social Inferences Create Product Ratings Faster
【24h】

What If We Ask A Different Question?: Social Inferences Create Product Ratings Faster

机译:如果我们问一个不同的问题,怎么办?:社会推论更快创造产品评分

获取原文

摘要

Consumer product reviews are the backbone of commerce online. Most commonly, sites ask users for their personal opinions on a product or service. I conjecture, however, that this traditional method of eliciting reviews often invites idiosyncratic viewpoints. In this paper, I present a statistical study examining the differences between traditionally elicited product ratings (i.e., "How do you rate this product?") and social inference ratings (i.e., "How do you think other people will rate this product?"). In 5 of 6 trials, I find that social inference ratings produce the same aggregate product rating as the one produced via traditionally elicited ratings. In all cases, however, social inferences yield less variance. This is significant because using social inference ratings 1) therefore converges on the true aggregate product rating faster, and 2) is a cheap design intervention on the part of existing sites.
机译:消费产品评论是在线商务的骨干。最常见的是,网站向用户询问产品或服务的个人意见。然而,我猜测,这种传统的引发评论方法往往邀请了特殊的观点。在本文中,我提出了一种统计研究,检查传统引发的产品评级之间的差异(即,“您如何评价本产品?”)和社会推理评级(即“您如何认为其他人将评价此产品?” )。在6个试验中,我发现社会推理评级产生与通过传统引发的评级产生的总产值相同的总产值。然而,在所有情况下,社会推论都会产生更少的方差。这是显着的,因为使用社会推理评级1)因此收敛于真正的聚合产品评级更快,而且2)是现有网站的廉价设计干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号