首页> 外文会议>Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology >The Role of Networks in Science Communication and Engagement with Non-Expert Publics
【24h】

The Role of Networks in Science Communication and Engagement with Non-Expert Publics

机译:网络在科学沟通与非专家公众的参与中的作用

获取原文

摘要

In this ongoing study, I examine associations among scientists by analyzing scholarly publication data and Internet hyperlink relationships using a social network analysis framework. Unlike other studies of collaboration, this study does not start with an extant network of scientists who share a research focus, but rather groups who are networked for purposes of public and political engagement. I have chosen as my nodes two presumed "networks" of scientists: the group of 16 scientists who authored a January 27th', 2012 op-ed in The Wall Street Journal which suggested concerns about climate change were being exaggerated, and the group of 38 scientists who authored a response piece (supporting climate change science) on February 1st. I have chosen climate science because of its scientific complexity that is of necessity interdisciplinary, and its scrutiny by non-expert publics. Building on the theoretical foundations of social epistemology, I examine how notions of the role of shared practices in engendering trust and knowledge-sharing among expert groups can be applied when the lines between expert and non-expert are contested in high-visibility public arenas. In exploring some of those questions, this study aims to discover if a social network methodology combining co-authorship data and hyperlink data can reveal patterns of association and engagement with traditional (e.g., scholarly publications) vs. non-traditional (e.g., web sites or blog articles) methods of communication and legitimation. This study is intended as part of a larger research trajectory examining the role of social associations in influencing credibility and information trust decisions in areas where expert and non-experts must meet and negotiate shared meanings. These findings could suggest future directions for collaborative data sharing practices as well as support theoretical work in understanding how trust and credibility are granted in networked information environments.
机译:在这个正在进行的研究中,我通过使用社交网络分析框架分析学术出版物数据和互联网超链接关系来研究科学家之间的关联。与其他合作研究不同,本研究并未以分享研究重点的现存科学家网络,而是为公共和政治参与而被联网的团体。我选择了我的节点,这是科学家的两个推定的“网络”:2012年1月27日撰写的16名科学家们在华尔街日记中举行的,这表明对气候变化的担忧被夸大了,而38岁撰写了2月1日撰写回复片(支持气候变化科学)的科学家。我选择了气候科学,因为它的科学复杂性是必要的跨学科,而非专家公众的审查。建立在社会认识论的理论基础上,我研究了在高知名度公共场地争夺的专家和非专家之间的界线时,如何应用共享行为在专家组中的信任和知识共享中的共享行为的作用方式。在探索其中一些问题时,本研究旨在发现组合共同作者数据和超级链接数据的社交网络方法,可以揭示与传统(例如,学术出版物)与非传统(例如,网站)的关联模式和参与或博客文章)沟通和合法性的方法。本研究旨在作为较大的研究轨迹的一部分,审查社会协会在专家和非专家必须符合和谈判共享含义的地区的信誉和信息信任决策中的作用。这些调查结果可以提出未来的协作数据共享实践的指示,并支持理解网络信息环境中授予信任和可信度的理论工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号