首页> 外文会议>U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics >A comparison of methods for determining m_i the Hoek-Brown parameter for intact rock material
【24h】

A comparison of methods for determining m_i the Hoek-Brown parameter for intact rock material

机译:用于确定完整岩材料的M_I HOEK-棕色参数的方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The intact rock constant, m_i is one of the three basic input parameters required for the widely used Hoek-Brown failure criterion. In the absence of laboratory testing, guideline charts with m_i values based on rock type have been provided by Hoek & Brown and others. Our analysis of existing databases on rock material properties (such as Sheorey, Douglas and Rocscience) demonstrates that there is a very poor correlation between lithology and m_i values. The databases, together with the results of further uniaxial, triaxial and tensile laboratory testing, have been used to assess the relationship between the ratio of uniaxial to tensile strength (R) and m_i. The paper concludes that the most accurate method of assessing m_i values remains as statistical analysis of data from a full set of triaxial tests plus tensile tests. In the absence of such testing, the use of R as a means of estimating m_i is considered to be a preferable alternative to relying on guideline charts.
机译:完整的岩石常数,M_I是广泛使用的Hoek-Brown失效标准所需的三个基本输入参数之一。在没有实验室测试的情况下,Hoek&Brown和其他人提供了基于岩石类型的M_I值的指南图表。我们对现有数据库的岩石材料属性(如Sheorey,Douglas和Rocscience)的分析表明,岩性和M_i值之间存在非常差的相关性。该数据库与进一步单轴,三轴和拉伸实验室检测的结果一起用于评估单轴与拉伸强度(R)和M_I的比率之间的关系。本文得出结论,评估M_I值的最准确的方法仍然是来自一整套三轴试验加强度试验的数据的统计分析。在没有这种测试的情况下,将R作为估计M_I的手段被认为是依赖于指南图表的优选替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号