首页> 外文会议>Symposium on International Automotive Technology >CAE Methodology of Leaf Spring Suspension and Its Experimental Verification for Commercial Vehicle
【24h】

CAE Methodology of Leaf Spring Suspension and Its Experimental Verification for Commercial Vehicle

机译:板簧悬架的CAE方法与商用车辆的实验验证

获取原文

摘要

The job of a suspension system is to maximize the friction between the tires and the road surface, to provide steering stability with good handling and to act as a cushioning device to ensure the comfort of the driver and passengers. The suspension system also protects the vehicle and any cargo or luggage from damage and wear. Commonly the strength of these suspension systems is evaluated by endurance trials on field or Rig testing which are time consuming and costly. On the other hand, virtual testing methods for strength and stiffness evaluation provide useful information early in the design cycle and save significant time and cost. However, the virtual method also needs validation, which can be achieved by physical co-relations (via rig tests). A study has been done to predict the behavior of Leaf Spring Suspensions entirely through the FEA (Finite Element Analysis) route and correlating those results with physical test. Initially the acceleration data is abstracted via RLDA (Road Load Data Acquisition) pasting the accelerometers at axle points. Strain Gauges are used to acquire strain values with respect to accelerations. This acceleration data is then used as input in rig setup at axle points and relatively strain is measured at same strain gauge locations as done while RLDA. This is done primarily to validate the test rig. After Rig validation, a virtual validation is required. Leaf Spring assemblies modeled in FEA are similar to rig test bed setup. Tests are performed on the rig and gauges are used to extract the data for virtual co-relation. At the time of simulation, various parameters have been modified to achieve realistic behavior. Correlations between Stiffness and Stress have been achieved at these strain gauge locations between the Rig test and CAE (Computer Aided Engineering) results. Correlation (around 90%) has been achieved between Rig test data and FEA results at measured locations. Correlation has helped in reducing product design time and cost of running the rig until crack. This process has also reduced the cost by using soft validation for multiple Leaf Spring Suspensions like Semi-elliptical, Parabolic, Weveller, Bogie and Bell Crank. Hence, this FEA based methodology has facilitated our organization in designing an excellent suspension system which will prove beneficial to our customers.
机译:悬架系统的工作是最大化轮胎和路面之间的摩擦,以提供具有良好处理的转向稳定性,并充当缓冲装置,以确保驾驶员和乘客的舒适性。悬架系统还保护车辆和任何货物或行李免受损坏和磨损。通常,通过对现场或钻机测试的耐久性试验来评估这些悬架系统的强度,这是耗时和昂贵的。另一方面,强度和刚度评估的虚拟测试方法在设计周期早期提供了有用的信息,并节省了显着的时间和成本。但是,虚拟方法还需要验证,这可以通过物理共同关系(通过钻机测试)来实现。已经完成了一项研究以预测穿过FEA(有限元分析)路线的叶子弹簧悬浮液的行为,并将这些结果与物理测试相关联。最初,加速数据通过RLDA(道路负载数据采集)绘制轴向时的加速度计。应变仪用于在加速度获取应变值。然后将该加速度数据用作轴点的钻机设置中的输入,并且在与RLDA的同一应变仪位置处测量相对应变。这主要是为了验证测试钻机。钻机验证后,需要虚拟验证。在FEA中建模的叶子弹簧组件类似于钻机试验台设置。在钻机上执行测试,并且仪表用于提取虚拟共同关系的数据。在仿真时,已经修改了各种参数以实现现实行为。在钻机测试和CAE(计算机辅助工程)结果之间的这些应变仪位置已经实现了刚度和应力之间的相关性。在测量位置之间已经实现了钻机测试数据和FEA的相关性(约90%)。相关性有助于降低产品设计时间和运行钻机直到裂缝的成本。该过程还通过使用半椭圆形,抛物线,Weveller,转向架和贝尔曲柄等多个叶子弹簧悬架的软验证来降低成本。因此,这种基于FEA的方法促进了我们的组织设计了一个优秀的悬架系统,这将为我们的客户提供有利于我们的利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号