首页> 外文会议>International Drainage Symposium >Modeling performance of a tile drainage system incorporating mole drainage
【24h】

Modeling performance of a tile drainage system incorporating mole drainage

机译:包含摩尔排水的瓷砖排水系统的建模性能

获取原文

摘要

In fine textured low permeability soil profiles, mole drainage is used as a supplementary measure to subsurface tile drains. However, performance is known to vary temporally and spatially due to variations in soil properties, installation conditions,mole channel integrity and weather patterns. A model study is presented whereby a finite element software package, SEEP/W, has been calibrated and validated for a field site having (System 1) subsurface tile drains with gravel aggregate (0.9 m depth, 15m spacing) and intersecting mole drains (0.6 m depth, 1.4 m spacing) on the west coast of Ireland. The calibrated model showed close agreement between modeled and observed subsurface drainage (index of agreement = 0.89) and predicted cumulative subsurface drainage volumes 12% higher than observed in the validation period. The model was then used to evaluate the impact of a range of alternative drainage designs namely; System 2: tile drains only; System 3; Similar to System 1 with ks of the mole drainedsoil layer decreased to mimic a reduction in mole drain integrity/effectiveness and System 4: Similar to System 1 with ks of the mole drained soil layer increased to mimic improved soil disturbance and fissuring during installation. These systems were analysed under the calibration (Event A) and validation (Event B) dataset rainfall scenarios as well as notional rainfall scenarios; the "fixed rainfall" scenario (Event C), a rainfall rate of 2 mm/h applied to all systems for 50 hours and the "historicalrainfall" scenario (Event D), the annual average (30 year) daily values for the area (taken as the average monthly total divided by the number of days) applied over a year. The designs modeled exhibited similar relative behavior in all simulated rainfallscenarios. Systems 1 and 4 consistently outperformed Systems 2 and 3 in terms of average and peak discharge and watertable control capacity. System 2 (without mole drains) was the least effective and was seen to decrease drain discharge by an average of54% and reduce mean watertable depth by an average of 62% relative to Systems 1 and 4 across rainfall events.
机译:在细微纹理的低渗透性土壤型材中,鼹鼠排水用作辅助铺面块沟槽的补充措施。然而,由于土壤性质,安装条件,摩尔通道完整性和天气模式的变化,已知性能在时间和空间上随时和空间。提出了一种模型研究,其中有限元软件包SEEP / W已经校准并验证了具有砾石骨料(0.9M深度,15m间距)和交叉鼹鼠漏斗(0.6的系统1)地下瓷砖排水口(0.6在爱尔兰西海岸的M深度,1.4米间距。校准模型显示建模和观察地下排水(协议指数= 0.89)之间的密切一致,并且预测累积地下排水量比在验证期内观察到的12%。然后使用该模型来评估一系列替代排水设计的影响。系统2:瓷砖漏斗;系统3;与系统1类似于摩尔龙杆菌层的Ks降低以模仿鼹鼠漏极完整性/有效性和系统4的降低:与系统1类似于摩尔排出的土壤层的Ks增加,以模仿安装过程中的改善的土壤扰动和裂缝。这些系统在校准(事件a)和验证(事件b)数据集降量场景中进行了分析,以及名义降雨场景; “固定降雨”情景(事件C),适用于所有系统的降雨率为50小时,并“历史列表”情景(事件D),该地区的年平均每日(30年)随着每月的平均每月除以一年)。所建模的设计在所有模拟的降雨中表现出类似的相对行为。系统1和4在平均和峰值放电和水无水控制容量方​​面始终如一地优于系统2和3。系统2(没有鼹鼠漏极)是最不有效的,并且被视为平均值降低漏极放电,并将平均水电深度减少平均相对于降雨事件的系统1和4的62%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号