首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics >A Review of Current Human Reliability Assessment Methods Utilized in High Hazard Human-System Interface Design
【24h】

A Review of Current Human Reliability Assessment Methods Utilized in High Hazard Human-System Interface Design

机译:高危险人力系统界面设计中利用当前人力可靠性评估方法的综述

获取原文

摘要

This paper has three objectives. The first is to discuss the role that human reliability assessment implemented in human systems interface design. The second is to present significant characteristics of available HRA techniques. The third is to provide our viewpoints of the applicability of HRA methods in HIS design. Generally, HRA approaches advocate seven stages, problem definition, performances shaping factors analysis, task analysis, human error analysis, effect analysis, error reduction strategies, and evaluation of recommendations. The most difficult technique is the human error probability estimation and prediction. There are four shortcomings of past human error probability estimation and prediction methods. First, the reliable data is deficient. Second, there are insufficient criteria for choosing PSFs. Third, there is a limited capacity for evaluating cognitive behavior. Finally, possible causes are ignored. To look into the above-described problems, this study reviewed present HRA methods and proposed several aspects for future HRA method development.
机译:本文有三个目标。首先是探讨人类系统界面设计中实施的人力可靠性评估的作用。第二是呈现可用HRA技术的显着特征。第三是提供我们对他设计中HRA方法适用性的观点。通常,HRA方法倡导七个阶段,问题定义,表演塑造因子分析,任务分析,人为误差分析,效果分析,错误减少策略和建议评估。最困难的技术是人为错误概率估计和预测。过去的人为错误概率估计和预测方法有四种缺点。首先,可靠的数据缺乏。其次,选择PSF的标准不足。第三,评估认知行为的能力有限。最后,忽略可能的原因。为了研究上述问题,本研究审查了目前的HRA方法,并提出了未来HRA方法的几个方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号