【24h】

A Review of Current Human Reliability Assessment Methods Utilized in High Hazard Human-System Interface Design

机译:高危害人机界面设计中当前的人类可靠性评估方法的综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper has three objectives. The first is to discuss the role that human reliability assessment implemented in human systems interface design. The second is to present significant characteristics of available HRA techniques. The third is to provide our viewpoints of the applicability of HRA methods in HIS design. Generally, HRA approaches advocate seven stages, problem definition, performances shaping factors analysis, task analysis, human error analysis, effect analysis, error reduction strategies, and evaluation of recommendations. The most difficult technique is the human error probability estimation and prediction. There are four shortcomings of past human error probability estimation and prediction methods. First, the reliable data is deficient. Second, there are insufficient criteria for choosing PSFs. Third, there is a limited capacity for evaluating cognitive behavior. Finally, possible causes are ignored. To look into the above-described problems, this study reviewed present HRA methods and proposed several aspects for future HRA method development.
机译:本文有三个目标。首先是讨论人的可靠性评估在人机界面设计中的作用。第二个是呈现可用的HRA技术的重要特征。第三是提供HRA方法在HIS设计中的适用性的观点。通常,HRA方法倡导七个阶段,即问题定义,绩效影响因素分析,任务分析,人为错误分析,效果分析,错误减少策略以及建议评估。最困难的技术是人为错误概率估计和预测。过去的人为错误概率估计和预测方法存在四个缺点。首先,可靠数据不足。其次,选择PSF的标准不足。第三,评估认知行为的能力有限。最后,可能的原因被忽略。为了解决上述问题,本研究回顾了当前的HRA方法,并提出了一些未来HRA方法开发的方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号