首页> 外文会议>Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center Symposium >Safety Climate: Leading or Lagging Indicator of Safety Outcomes?
【24h】

Safety Climate: Leading or Lagging Indicator of Safety Outcomes?

机译:安全气候:安全结果的领先或滞后指标?

获取原文

摘要

A recent meta-analytic study of the safety climate research confirmed positive relationships between safety climate and safety performance (compliance and participation) and negative relationships between safety climate and occupational accidents/injuries (Clarke, 2006a). This study also revealed some important moderators of these relationships including study design, specifically the timing of the measurement of the safety-related variables (i.e., accidents/injuries) relative to the measurement of safety climate with prospective designs yielding stronger relationships than retrospective designs. Building on these empirical findings, we theorize why these differences emerge and how these relationships might be further moderated by the source of the safety-outcome data and/or the time lag between the measure of safety climate and the safety outcomes. Implications for safety climate research, study design, and climate change are discussed.
机译:最近对安全气候研究的荟萃分析研究证实了安全气候和安全性能之间的积极关系(遵守和参与)和安全气候与职业事故/伤害之间的负面关系(Clarke,2006a)。 本研究还揭示了一些重要的主持人,包括研究设计,特别是相对于安全气候测量的安全相关变量(即,事故/伤害)的测量的时间,与前瞻性设计产生更强的关系,而不是回顾性设计。 在这些实证调查结果上建立,我们理论为什么这些差异出现,以及如何通过安全 - 结果数据的来源和/或安全气候测量与安全结果之间的时间滞后进一步调节这些关系。 讨论了对安全气候研究,研究设计和气候变化的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号